Contrast medium use

被引:130
作者
Davidson, Charles
Stacul, Fulvio
McCullough, Peter A.
Tumlin, James
Adam, Andy
Lameire, Norbert
Becker, Christoph R.
机构
[1] NW Mem Hosp, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ Trieste, Dept Radiol, Trieste, Italy
[3] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[4] SERRI, Charlotte, NC USA
[5] St Thomas Hosp, Dept Radiol, London SE1 7EH, England
[6] Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Univ Hosp Grosshadern, Dept Clin Radiol, Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Various properties of iodinated contrast media (osmolality, ionic versus nonionic, and viscosity) may contribute to contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Therefore, the choice of contrast medium affects the risk for CIN. There is good evidence that low-osmolar contrast media are less nephrotoxic than high-osmolar contrast media in patients at increased risk for CIN who receive intra-arterial iodinated contrast. Current evidence suggests that nonionic isosmolar contrast presents the lowest risk for CIN in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in those patients with diabetes mellitus. Intra-arterial administration of contrast media may be associated with a greater risk for CIN above that observed with intravenous administration. The use of gadolinium or CO2 as alternative contrast media to avoid the risk of nephrotoxicity cannot be substantiated by clinical trials and therefore cannot be recommended. Most studies show that, within a class, higher volumes (> 100 mL) of iodinated contrast medium are associated with a higher risk for CIN. However, in patients at high risk, such as those with CKD and diabetes, even small volumes of contrast medium can have adverse effects on renal function. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42K / 58K
页数:17
相关论文
共 111 条
  • [11] Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification
    Bartholomew, BA
    Harjai, KJ
    Dukkipati, S
    Boura, JA
    Yerkey, MW
    Glazier, S
    Grines, CL
    O'Neill, WW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (12) : 1515 - 1519
  • [12] Baumgart D, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V40, P241
  • [13] Renal angiography using carbon dioxide
    Beese, RC
    Bees, NR
    Belli, AM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (865) : 3 - 6
  • [14] GD-DOTA - EVALUATION OF ITS RENAL TOLERANCE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC-RENAL-FAILURE
    BELLIN, MF
    DERAY, G
    ASSOGBA, U
    AUBERTON, E
    GHANY, F
    DIONVOIRIN, E
    JACOBS, C
    GRELLET, J
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 10 (01) : 115 - 118
  • [15] Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing coronary artery procedures
    Briguori, C
    Colombo, A
    Airoldi, F
    Melzi, G
    Michev, I
    Carlino, M
    Montorfano, M
    Chieffo, A
    Bellanca, R
    Ricciardelli, B
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 67 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [16] Cademartiri Filippo, 2003, Radiol Med, V106, P269
  • [17] CAMPBELL DR, 1990, J CAN ASSOC RADIOL, V41, P133
  • [18] CO2 digital subtraction angiography for renal artery angioplasty in high-risk patients
    Caridi, JG
    Stavropoulos, SW
    Hawkins, IF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (06) : 1551 - 1556
  • [19] Effects of a dimeric vs a monomeric nonionic contrast medium on renal function in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Carraro, M
    Malalan, F
    Antonione, R
    Stacul, F
    Cova, M
    Petz, S
    Assante, M
    Grynne, B
    Haider, T
    Dalla Palma, L
    Faccini, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (01) : 144 - 147
  • [20] Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in renal impairment
    Chalmers, N
    Jackson, RW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (859) : 701 - 703