The impact of exposure variables on the induction of skin sensitization

被引:65
作者
Basketter, David A. [1 ]
Jefferies, Donna
Safford, Bob J.
Gilmour, Nicola J.
Jowsey, Ian R.
McFadden, John
Chansinghakul, Wannisa
Duangdeeden, Imelda
Kullavanijaya, Preya
机构
[1] Eurotox Registered Toxicol, Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Sharnbrook MK44 1PR, Beds, England
[2] St Thomas Hosp, St Johns Inst Dermatol, London SE1 7EH, England
[3] Res Dynam, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Inst Dermatol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
human repeated insult patch test; induction threshold; local lymph node assay; risk assessment; skin sensitization;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00906.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Whereas many investigations of the variables associated with the elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis have been undertaken, to the point where we can begin to predict the likelihood of elicitation occurring in a given situation, the same is not true for the induction of skin sensitization. Studies have demonstrated that increasing dose has an impact; in an experimental setting, a number of variables received attention some decades ago. However, in the work reported here, the relative importance of the frequency and the duration of exposure is highlighted. In an investigation using a human repeated insult patch test, it was demonstrated that reduction of the exposure duration from 48 hr to 5 min decreased the rate of sensitization to 1% p-phenylenediamine (PPD) from 54% to 3%. However, in an extended clinical study, it was observed that infrequent but longer duration and higher concentration exposure to PPD was significantly less likely to induce sensitization compared to more frequent, short duration, and lower concentration exposure. Detailed statistical analysis of the results indicated that the most important factor driving the induction of skin sensitization was the number of exposures.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 185
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   Quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis: uncertainty factors for mucosal exposures [J].
Farage, MA ;
Bjerke, DL ;
Mahony, C ;
Blackburn, KL ;
Gerberick, GF .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 49 (03) :140-147
[12]   Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis [J].
Felter, SP ;
Ryan, CA ;
Basketter, DA ;
Gilmour, NJ ;
Gerberick, GF .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 37 (01) :1-10
[13]   A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis [J].
Felter, SP ;
Robinson, MK ;
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 47 (05) :257-266
[14]  
Fregert S, 1981, MANUAL CONTACT DERMA
[15]  
Friedmann P S, 1990, Adv Dermatol, V5, P175
[16]  
FRIEDMANN P S, 1985, P275
[17]  
FRIEDMANN PS, 1996, TOXICOLOGY CONTACT H, P26
[18]  
Gerberick G F, 2001, Am J Contact Dermat, V12, P156, DOI 10.1053/ajcd.2001.23926
[19]   Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach [J].
Gerberick, GF ;
Robinson, MK ;
Felter, SP ;
White, IR ;
Basketter, DA .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 45 (06) :333-340
[20]   Dose-time relationships for elicitation of contact allergy to para-phenylenediamine [J].
Hextall, JM ;
Alagaratnam, NJ ;
Glendinning, AK ;
Holloway, DB ;
Blaikie, L ;
Basketter, DA ;
McFadden, JP .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 47 (02) :96-99