Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning

被引:71
作者
Kaiser, Adeel
Schultheiss, Timothy E.
Wong, Jeffrey Y. C.
Smith, David D.
Han, Chunhui
Vora, Nayana L.
Pezner, Richard D.
Chen, Yi-Jen
Radany, Eric H.
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiat Oncol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[4] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Informat Sci, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 66卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; head-and-neck cancer; setup variations; megavoltage-computed tomography; image-guided radiation therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: To use pretreatment megavoltage-computed tomography (MVCT) scans to evaluate positioning variations in pitch, roll, and yaw for patients treated with helical tomotherapy. Methods and Materials: Twenty prostate and 15 head-and-neck cancer patients were selected. Pretreatment MVCT scans were performed before every treatment fraction and automatically registered to planning kilo-voltage CT (KVCT) scans by bony landmarks. Image registration data were used to adjust patient setups before treatment. Corrections for pitch, roll, and yaw were recorded after bone registration, and data from fractions 1-5 and 16-20 were used to analyze mean rotational corrections. Results: For prostate patients, the means and standard deviations (in degrees) for pitch, roll, and yaw corrections were -0.60 :+/- 1.42, 0.66 +/- 1.22, and -0.33 +/- 0.83. In head-and-neck patients, the means and standard deviations (in degrees) were -0.24 +/- 1.19, -0.12 +/- 1.53, and 0.25 +/- 1.42 for pitch, roll, and yaw, respectively. No significant difference in rotational variations was observed between Weeks 1 and 4 of treatment. Head-and-neck patients had significantly smaller pitch variation, but significantly larger yaw variation, than prostate patients. No difference was found in roll corrections between the two groups. Overall, 96.6% of the rotational corrections were less than 4 degrees. Conclusions: The initial rotational setup errors for prostate and head-and-neck patients were all small in magnitude, statistically significant, but did not vary considerably during the course of radiotherapy. The data are relevant to couch hardware design for correcting rotational setup variations. There should be no theoretical difference between these data and data collected using cone beam KVCT on conventional linacs. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 955
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Alasti, H ;
Petric, MP ;
Catton, CN ;
Warde, PR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03) :869-884
[2]
Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy [J].
Antolak, JA ;
Rosen, II ;
Childress, CH ;
Zagars, GK ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03) :661-672
[3]
A novel method to correct for pitch and yaw patient setup errors in helical tomotherapy [J].
Boswell, SA ;
Jeraj, R ;
Ruchala, KJ ;
Olivera, GH ;
Jaradat, HA ;
James, JA ;
Gutierrez, A ;
Pearson, D ;
Frank, G ;
Mackie, TR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) :1630-1639
[4]
ROBUST TESTS FOR EQUALITY OF VARIANCES [J].
BROWN, MB ;
FORSYTHE, AB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (346) :364-367
[5]
PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS [J].
CROOK, JM ;
RAYMOND, Y ;
SALHANI, D ;
YANG, H ;
ESCHE, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :35-42
[6]
Measurement of patient positioning errors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the prostate [J].
Hanley, J ;
Lumley, MA ;
Mageras, GS ;
Sun, J ;
Zelefsky, MJ ;
Leibel, SA ;
Fuks, Z ;
Kutcher, GJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (02) :435-444
[7]
The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy [J].
Hong, TS ;
Tomé, WA ;
Chappell, RJ ;
Chinnaiyan, P ;
Mehta, MP ;
Harari, PM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :779-788
[8]
A tilt and roll device for automated correction of rotational setup errors [J].
Hornick, DC ;
Litzenberg, DW ;
Lam, KL ;
Balter, JM ;
Hetrick, J ;
Ten Haken, RK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (09) :1739-1740
[9]
AN EVALUATION OF SETUP UNCERTAINTIES FOR PATIENTS TREATED TO PELVIC SITES [J].
HUNT, MA ;
SCHULTHEISS, TE ;
DESOBRY, GE ;
HAKKI, M ;
HANKS, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (01) :227-233
[10]
THE EFFECT OF SETUP UNCERTAINTIES ON THE TREATMENT OF NASOPHARYNX CANCER [J].
HUNT, MA ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
BURMAN, C ;
FASS, D ;
HARRISON, L ;
LEIBEL, S ;
FUKS, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (02) :437-447