Negative psychological effects of selection methods: Construct formulation and an empirical investigation into an assessment center

被引:18
作者
Anderson, Neil [1 ]
Goltsi, Vicki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00344.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This paper defines and formulates the construct of negative psychological effects (NPEs) of selection and assessment methods upon applicants. The results of an empirical study into NPEs in an operational assessment center are also reported. Applicants (n=107) completed measures at three timepoints: Time 1 (just before the AC), Time 2 (immediately after the AC but before outcome decisions were known), and Time 3 (6 months after the AC). Both accepted and rejected candidates completed all three measures, which included self-esteem, mental health, positive and negative affect, and career exploration behavior. No evidence of NPEs was found for rejected candidates despite significant between-group differences on feedback reactions level items. Interestingly, well-being and positive affect declined slightly for successful candidates at subsequent measurement compared against baseline Time 1 norms. Reactions level outcomes did, however, differ significantly between accepted and rejected candidates, with the latter rating feedback dimensions far less favorably. These results are discussed in relation to future research into the psychological impact of selection procedures upon candidates and the need for applied psychologists and HR practitioners to demonstrate that assessment methods do not exhibit NPEs upon applicants.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 255
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Editorial - The dark side of the moon: Applicant perspectives, negative psychological effects (NPEs), and candidate decision making in selection [J].
Anderson, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (1-2) :1-8
[2]  
Anderson N, 2005, BLACKWELL HDB PERSON, P1
[3]  
ANDERSON N, 2006, J APPL PSYCHOL, V9, P219
[4]  
[Anonymous], HDB IND WORK ORG PSY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT J MANAG REV, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1468-2370.00004, 10.1111/14682370, DOI 10.1111/14682370]
[6]   Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback [J].
Bauer, TN ;
Maertz, CP ;
Dolen, MR ;
Campion, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (06) :892-903
[7]   Applicant reactions to different selection technology: Face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews [J].
Bauer, TN ;
Truxillo, DM ;
Paronto, ME ;
Weekley, JA ;
Campion, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (1-2) :135-148
[8]   An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (1-2) :9-23
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[10]   How applicants want and expect to be treated: Applicants' selection treatment beliefs and the development of the social process questionnaire on selection [J].
Derous, E ;
Born, MP ;
De Witte, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (1-2) :99-119