Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography

被引:34
作者
Gennaro, Gisella
di Maggio, Cosimo
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Oncol & Surg Sci, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Dept Phys, Padua Unit, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
mammography; digital mammography; dosimetry in mammography; average glandular dose;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-006-0314-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The study purpose was the comparison between doses delivered by a full-field digital mammography system and a screen/film mammography unit, both using the same type of X-ray tube. Exposure parameters and breast thickness were collected for 300 screen/film (GE Senographe DMR) and 296 digital mammograms (GE Senographe 2000D). The entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was calculated from anode/filter combination, kV(p) and mAs values and breast thickness, by simulating spectra through a program based on a catalogue of experimental X-ray spectra. The average glandular dose (AGD) was also computed. Results showed an overall reduction of average glandular dose by 27% of digital over screen/film mammography. The dose saving was about 15% for thin and thick breasts, while it was between 30% and 40% for intermediate thicknesses. Full-field digital mammography dose reduction is allowed by wider dynamic range and higher efficiency of digital detector, which can be exposed at higher energy spectra than screen/film mammography, and by the separation between acquisition and displaying processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2559 / 2566
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C [J].
Ay, MR ;
Shahriari, M ;
Sarkar, S ;
Adib, M ;
Zaidi, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (21) :4897-4917
[2]   Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography [J].
Beckett, JR ;
Kotre, CJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (03) :801-813
[3]  
Berger M.J., 1987, United States, Technical Report., DOI DOI 10.2172/6016002
[4]   Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose [J].
Berns, EA ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Cutter, GR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (03) :334-340
[5]   Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice [J].
Berns, EA ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Cutter, GR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :830-834
[6]   COMPUTATION OF BREMSSTRAHLUNG X-RAY-SPECTRA AND COMPARISON WITH SPECTRA MEASURED WITH A GE(LI) DETECTOR [J].
BIRCH, R ;
MARSHALL, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1979, 24 (03) :505-517
[7]   A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme [J].
Burch, A ;
Goodman, DA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (845) :517-527
[8]   Patient dose in digital mammography [J].
Chevalier, M ;
Morán, P ;
Ten, JI ;
Soto, JMF ;
Cepeda, T ;
Vañó, E .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (09) :2471-2479
[9]   Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer SenoScan digital mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population [J].
Cole, E ;
Pisano, ED ;
Brown, M ;
Kuzmiak, C ;
Braeuning, MP ;
Kim, HH ;
Jong, R ;
Walsh, R .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :879-886
[10]  
Cranley K., 1997, CATALOGUE DIAGNOSTIC