A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints

被引:163
作者
Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. [1 ]
Georgiadis, Michael C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Chem Engn, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Mixed integer linear programming; Unit commitment problem; Long term energy planning; Electricity markets; CO2; emissions; System marginal price; WIND POWER; TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION; ENERGY-SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY; OPTIMIZATION; PENETRATION; FLEXIBILITY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.054
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
080707 [能源环境工程]; 082001 [油气井工程];
摘要
This work presents a generic mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model that integrates the unit commitment problem (UCP), i.e., daily energy planning with the long-term generation expansion planning (GEP) framework. Typical daily constraints at an hourly level such as start-up and shut-down related decisions (start-up type, minimum up and down time, synchronization, soak and desynchronization time constraints), ramping limits, system reserve requirements are combined with representative yearly constraints such as power capacity additions, power generation bounds of each unit, peak reserve requirements, and energy policy issues (renewables penetration limits, CO2 emissions cap and pricing). For modelling purposes, a representative day (24 h) of each month over a number of years has been employed in order to determine the optimal capacity additions, electricity market clearing prices, and daily operational planning of the studied power system. The model has been tested on an illustrative case study of the Greek power system. Our approach aims to provide useful insight into strategic and challenging decisions to be determined by investors and/or policy makers at a national and/or regional level by providing the optimal energy roadmap under real operating and design constraints. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 331
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
New technology integration approach for energy planning with carbon emission considerations [J].
Ahmed, Sajjad ;
Elsholkami, Mohamed ;
Elkamel, Ali ;
Du, Juan ;
Ydstie, Erik B. ;
Douglas, Peter L. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 95 :170-180
[2]
Financial risk management for new technology integration in energy planning under uncertainty [J].
Ahmed, Sajjad ;
Elsholkami, Mohamed ;
Elkamel, Ali ;
Du, Juan ;
Ydstie, Erik B. ;
Douglas, Peter L. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 128 :75-81
[3]
An overview of Greece's wholesale electricity market with emphasis on ancillary services [J].
Andrianesis, Panagiotis ;
Biskas, Pandelis ;
Liberopoulos, George .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (08) :1631-1642
[4]
[Anonymous], 2015, GAMS-A User's Guide
[5]
A multi-period mixed-integer linear optimisation of future electricity supply considering life cycle costs and environmental impacts [J].
Barteczko-Hibbert, Christian ;
Bonis, Ioannis ;
Binns, Michael ;
Theodoropoulos, Constantinos ;
Azapagic, Adisa .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 133 :317-334
[6]
Accounting for flexibility in power system planning with renewables [J].
Belderbos, Andreas ;
Delarue, Erik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 71 :33-41
[7]
Increasing wind power penetration into the existing Serbian energy system [J].
Bjelic, Ilija Batas ;
Rajakovia, Nikola ;
Cosic, Boris ;
Duic, Neven .
ENERGY, 2013, 57 :30-37
[8]
A multi-region optimization planning model for China's power sector [J].
Cheng, Rui ;
Xu, Zhaofeng ;
Liu, Pei ;
Wang, Zhe ;
Li, Zheng ;
Jones, Ian .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 137 :413-426
[9]
The first step towards a 100% renewable energy-system for Ireland [J].
Connolly, D. ;
Lund, H. ;
Mathiesen, B. V. ;
Leahy, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (02) :502-507
[10]
A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems [J].
Connolly, D. ;
Lund, H. ;
Mathiesen, B. V. ;
Leahy, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (04) :1059-1082