The use of mixed-integer programming for inverse treatment planning with pre-defined field segments

被引:49
作者
Bednarz, G [1 ]
Michalski, D [1 ]
Houser, C [1 ]
Huq, MS [1 ]
Xiao, Y [1 ]
Anne, PR [1 ]
Galvin, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/47/13/304
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Complex intensity patterns generated by traditional beamlet-based inverse treatment plans are often very difficult to deliver. In the approach presented in this work the intensity maps are controlled by pre-defining field segments to be used for dose optimization. A set of simple rules was used to define a pool of allowable delivery segments and the mixed-integer programming (MIP) method was used to optimize segment weights. The optimization problem was formulated by combining real variables describing segment weights with a set of binary variables, used to enumerate voxels in targets and critical structures. The MIP method was compared to the previously used Cimmino projection algorithm. The field segmentation approach was compared to an inverse planning system with a traditional beamlet-based beam intensity optimization. In four complex cases of oropharyngeal cancer the segmental inverse planning produced treatment plans, which competed with traditional beamlet-based IMRT plans. The mixed-integer programming provided mechanism for imposition of dose-volume constraints and allowed for identification of the optimal solution for feasible problems. Additional advantages of the segmental technique presented here are: simplified dosimetry, quality assurance and treatment delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:2235 / 2245
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   COMBINING MULTILEAF FIELDS TO MODULATE FLUENCE DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
GALVIN, JM ;
CHEN, XG ;
SMITH, RM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (03) :697-705
[12]  
Galvin JM, 2000, MED PHYS MG, P73
[13]  
Kolman B.Beck., 1995, Elementary Linear Programming with Applications, V2nd
[14]   Smoothing intensity-modulated beam profiles to improve the efficiency of delivery [J].
Spirou, SV ;
Fournier-Bidoz, N ;
Yang, J ;
Chui, CS ;
Ling, CC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (10) :2105-2112
[15]  
Sternick ES, 1997, The theory and practice of intensity modulated radiation therapy
[16]   Inverse planning with constraints to generate smoothed intensity-modulated beams [J].
Webb, S ;
Convery, DJ ;
Evans, PM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10) :2785-2794
[17]   OPTIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEALING OF 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL TREATMENT PLANNING FOR RADIATION-FIELDS DEFINED BY A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR [J].
WEBB, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 36 (09) :1201-1226
[18]   The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: A treatment design study [J].
Wu, QW ;
Manning, M ;
Schmidt-Ullrich, R ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01) :195-205
[19]   Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 GY [J].
Xia, P ;
Pickett, B ;
Vigneault, E ;
Verhey, LJ ;
Roach, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (01) :244-254
[20]   An optimized forward-planning technique for intensity modulated radiation therapy [J].
Xiao, Y ;
Galvin, J ;
Hossain, M ;
Valicenti, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (09) :2093-2099