Evaluation of the validity of a convolution method for incorporating tumour movement and set-up variations into the radiotherapy treatment planning system

被引:59
作者
McCarter, SD
Beckham, WA
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[2] Vancouver Isl Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Phys, BC Canc Agcy, Victoria, BC V8R 1J8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/308
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Modern radiotherapy techniques have developed to a point where the ability to conform to a particular tumour shape is limited by organ motion and set-up variations. The result is that dose distributions displayed by treatment planning systems based on static beam modelling are not representative of the dose received by the patient during a fractionated course of radiotherapy. The convolution-based method to account for these variations in radiation treatment planning systems has been suggested in previous work. The validity of the convolution method is tested by comparing the dose distribution obtained from this convolution method with the dose distribution obtained by summing the contribution to the total dose from each fraction of a fractionated treatment (for increasing numbers of fractions) and simulating random target position variations between fractions. For larger numbers of fractions (greater than or similar to 15) which are the norm for radical treatment schemes, it is clear that incorporation of movement by a convolution method could potentially produce a more accurate dose distribution. There are some limitations that have been identified, however, especially in relation to the heterogeneous nature of patient tissues, which require further investigation before the technique could be applied clinically.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 931
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: How much margin is needed? [J].
Antolak, JA ;
Rosen, II .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1165-1170
[2]   Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy [J].
Bel, A ;
vanHerk, M ;
Lebesque, JV .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (09) :1537-1545
[3]   A VERIFICATION PROCEDURE TO IMPROVE PATIENT SET-UP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BEL, A ;
VANHERK, M ;
BARTELINK, H ;
LEBESQUE, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) :253-260
[4]   Target position variability throughout prostate radiotherapy [J].
Dawson, LA ;
Mah, K ;
Franssen, E ;
Morton, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (05) :1155-1161
[5]   ROUTINE CLINICAL ONLINE PORTAL IMAGING FOLLOWED BY IMMEDIATE FIELD ADJUSTMENT USING A TELE-CONTROLLED PATIENT COUCH [J].
DENEVE, W ;
VANDENHEUVEL, F ;
DEBEUKELEER, M ;
COGHE, M ;
THON, L ;
DEROOVER, P ;
VANLANCKER, M ;
STORME, G .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 24 (01) :45-54
[6]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PATIENT REPOSITIONING DURING RADIOTHERAPY USING A MEGAVOLTAGE IMAGING-SYSTEM [J].
GILDERSLEVE, J ;
DEARNALEY, DP ;
EVANS, PM ;
LAW, M ;
RAWLINGS, C ;
SWINDELL, W .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 31 (02) :161-168
[7]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF PATIENT POSITIONING DURING ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY, AS ASSESSED BY AN INTEGRATED MEGAVOLTAGE IMAGING-SYSTEM [J].
GILDERSLEVE, J ;
DEARNALEY, DP ;
EVANS, PM ;
SWINDELL, W .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 35 (02) :151-160
[8]  
International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements, 1993, 50 ICRU
[9]  
Keall P. J., 1999, Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, V22, P48
[10]   IMPLEMENTATION OF RANDOM POSITIONING ERROR IN COMPUTERIZED RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF FRACTIONATION [J].
LEONG, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (03) :327-334