Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy

被引:159
作者
Bullock, Justin B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Bush Sch Govt & Publ Serv, Publ Serv & Adm, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; bureaucracy; discretion; administration; governance; ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; STREET-LEVEL; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1177/0275074019856123
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This essay highlights the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in governance and society and explores the relationship between AI, discretion, and bureaucracy. AI is an advanced information communication technology tool (ICT) that changes both the nature of human discretion within a bureaucracy and the structure of bureaucracies. To better understand this relationship, AI, discretion, and bureaucracy are explored in some detail. It is argued that discretion and decision-making are strongly influenced by intelligence, and that improvements in intelligence, such as those that can be found within the field of AI, can help improve the overall quality of administration. Furthermore, the characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of both human discretion and AI are explored. Once these characteristics are laid out, a further exploration of the role AI may play in bureaucracies and bureaucratic structure is presented, followed by a specific focus on systems-level bureaucracies. In addition, it is argued that task distribution and task characteristics play a large role, along with the organizational and legal context, in whether a task favors human discretion or the use of AI. Complexity and uncertainty are presented as the major defining characteristics for categorizing tasks. Finally, a discussion is provided about the important cautions and concerns of utilizing AI in governance, in particular, with respect to existential risk and administrative evil.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 761
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]   From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control [J].
Bovens, M ;
Zouridis, S .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (02) :174-184
[22]   Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government [J].
Buffat, Aurelien .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (01) :149-161
[23]   Managing Risks in Public Organizations: A Conceptual Foundation and Research Agenda [J].
Bullock, Justin B. ;
Greer, Robert A. ;
O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr Jr .
PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 2019, 2 (01) :75-87
[24]   Sector Differences in Employee's Perceived Importance of Income and Job Security: Can These be Found Across the Contexts of Countries, Cultures, and Occupations? [J].
Bullock, Justin B. ;
Hansen, Jesper Rosenberg ;
Houston, David J. .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 21 (02) :243-271
[25]   International Comparison of Public and Private Employees' Work Motives, Attitudes, and Perceived Rewards [J].
Bullock, Justin B. ;
Stritch, Justin M. ;
Rainey, Hal G. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (03) :479-489
[26]   Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion [J].
Busch, Peter Andre ;
Henriksen, Helle Zinner .
INFORMATION POLITY, 2018, 23 (01) :3-28
[27]   The neuroscience of human intelligence differences [J].
Deary, Ian J. ;
Penke, Lars ;
Johnson, Wendy .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 11 (03) :201-211
[28]  
Dunn DelmerD., 1997, POLITICS ADM TOP LES
[29]  
Eubanks V., 2018, AUTOMATING INEQUALIT
[30]  
Feldman RonJ., 2002, The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, P186