Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer

被引:162
作者
Ben-Josef, E
Shields, AF
Vaishampayan, U
Vaitkevicius, V
El-Rayes, BF
McDermott, P
Burmeister, J
Bossenberger, T
Philip, PA
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Div Hematol Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 59卷 / 02期
关键词
IMRT; capecitabine; pancreatic cancer; radiosensitization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Local failure continues to be a major problem in the management of pancreatic cancer. Delivery of adequate radiation doses to the pancreas is limited by radiation-sensitive normal structures in the upper abdomen. To overcome some of these restrictions, we have developed a regimen of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent capecitabine. Methods and Material: This is a retrospective analysis of the first 15 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated on this regimen (7 as adjuvant therapy after curative resection and 8 patients for unresectable disease). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was planned using the CORVUS system and delivered with a segmented multileaf collimator, using a 6-MV photon beam and 10 intensity steps. Two target volumes were entered: target 1 consisted of the gross tumor volume (in unresectable cases) or the tumor bed (in postsurgical cases); and target 2 consisted of the draining lymph nodes. Both targets were treated simultaneously in 25 daily fractions, 5 days a week. In the postoperative setting, the total dose to target 1 was 45-54 Gy (median, 54 Gy). For unresectable disease the dose was 54-55 Gy (median, 54 Gy). The total dose to target 2 was 45 Gy in all patients. Patients were treated with one of two six-field beam arrangements found to produce superior dose distributions. Capecitabine was given at 1,600 mg/m(2)/day in two divided doses, 5 days per week, concurrently with radiotherapy. In addition, most patients (73%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Systemic chemotherapy was given before, after, or both before and after chemoradiotherapy in 47%, 7%, and 20% of patients, respectively. Patients were evaluated on a weekly basis. Results: Treatment was tolerated well. Grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting developed in 8 patients (53%) and Grade 1/2 hematologic toxicity developed in 9 patients (60%). Only 1 patient (7%) had Grade 3 toxicity, a gastric ulceration that responded to medical management. Nine patients (60%) had weight loss (median, 7 lbs; range, 3-12 lbs). The median follow-up time is 8.5 months (10.1 months in patients who are alive). In the resectable group there have been no deaths, and there has been 1 local relapse (14%). In the unresectable group there have been 2 deaths, and the 1-year actuarial survival rate is 69%. Two patients converted to resectability, 5 patients (62.5%) have persistent locoregional disease after chemoradiotherapy, and 1 patient (12%) is locally controlled without surgery. Conclusions: This regimen of IMRT with tumor-selective radiosensitization is well tolerated. The low toxicity profile compares favorably with that of protocols based on continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine, and the preliminary indications of efficacy are encouraging. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 459
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2003
  • [2] Radiotherapy and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma
    Boz, G
    De Paoli, A
    Innocente, R
    Rossi, C
    Tosolini, G
    Pederzoli, P
    Talamini, R
    Trovò, MG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03): : 736 - 740
  • [3] Phase I study of concomitant gemcitabine and IMRT for patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head
    Crane, CH
    Antolak, JA
    Rosen, II
    Forster, KM
    Evans, DB
    Janjan, NA
    Charnsangavej, C
    Pisters, PWT
    Lenzi, R
    Papagikos, MA
    Wolff, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2001, 30 (03) : 123 - 132
  • [4] DOUGLASS HO, 1987, CANCER, V59, P2006
  • [5] Phase I trial evaluating the concurrent combination of radiotherapy and capecitabine in rectal cancer
    Dunst, J
    Reese, T
    Sutter, T
    Zühlke, H
    Hinke, A
    Kölling-Schlebusch, K
    Frings, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (19) : 3983 - 3991
  • [6] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Emphasis on the selection and delineation of the targets
    Eisbruch, A
    Foote, RL
    O'Sullivan, B
    Beitler, JJ
    Vikram, B
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) : 238 - 249
  • [7] EVANS DB, 1997, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC, P1059
  • [8] GUDJONSSON B, 1987, CANCER, V60, P2284, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19871101)60:9<2284::AID-CNCR2820600930>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-V
  • [10] Ishii H, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V79, P1516, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970415)79:8<1516::AID-CNCR11>3.3.CO