Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization

被引:43
作者
Xing, L [1 ]
Li, JG [1 ]
Pugachev, A [1 ]
Le, QT [1 ]
Boyer, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
treatment planning; statistical analysis; intensity modulation; optimization; inverse planning;
D O I
10.1118/1.598749
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Treatment optimization is usually formulated as an inverse problem, which starts with a prescribed dose distribution and obtains an optimized solution under the guidance of an objective function. The solution is a compromise between the conflicting requirements of the target and sensitive structures. In this paper, the treatment plan optimization is formulated as an estimation problem of a discrete and possibly nonconvex system. The concept of preference function is introduced. Instead of prescribing a dose to a structure (or a set of voxels), the approach prioritizes the doses with different preference levels and reduces the problem into selecting a solution with a suitable estimator. The preference function provides a foundation for statistical analysis of the system and allows us to apply various techniques developed in statistical analysis to plan optimization. It is shown that an optimization based on a quadratic objective function is a special case of the formalism. A general two-step method for using a computer to determine the values of the model parameters is proposed. The approach provides an efficient way to include prior knowledge into the optimization process. The method is illustrated using a simplified two-pixel system as well as two clinical cases. The generality of the approach, coupled with promising demonstrations, indicates that the method has broad implications for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization. (C) 1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0093-2405(99)01011-1].
引用
收藏
页码:2348 / 2358
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation [J].
Ling, CC ;
Burman, C ;
Chui, CS ;
Kutcher, GJ ;
Leibel, SA ;
LoSasso, T ;
Mohan, R ;
Bortfeld, T ;
Reinstein, L ;
Spirou, S ;
Wang, XH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zelefsky, M ;
Fuks, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (04) :721-730
[12]   Inverse radiation treatment planning using the Dynamically Penalized Likelihood method [J].
Llacer, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (11) :1751-1764
[13]  
Luenberger D., 1974, Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming
[14]  
LUENBERGER DG, 1976, OPTIMIZATION VECTOR
[15]   THE POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF THE INVERSE RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUE [J].
MOHAN, R ;
WANG, XH ;
JACKSON, A ;
BORTFELD, T ;
BOYER, AL ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
LEIBEL, SA ;
FUKS, Z ;
LING, CC .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 32 (03) :232-248
[16]   DOSE-VOLUME CONSIDERATIONS WITH LINEAR-PROGRAMMING OPTIMIZATION [J].
MORRILL, SM ;
LANE, RG ;
WONG, JA ;
ROSEN, II .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (06) :1201-1210
[17]   Maximum likelihood as a common computational framework in tomotherapy [J].
Olivera, GH ;
Shepard, DM ;
Reckwerdt, PJ ;
Ruchala, K ;
Zachman, J ;
Fitchard, EE ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (11) :3277-3294
[18]   SEMI-AUTOMATED RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING WITH A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL TO SATISFY TREATMENT GOALS [J].
POWLIS, WD ;
ALTSCHULER, MD ;
CENSOR, Y ;
BUHLE, EL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (01) :271-276
[19]  
PRESS WH, 1989, NUMERICAL RECIPES
[20]   NEW TECHNIQUE FOR RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING USING QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING [J].
REDPATH, AT ;
VICKERY, BL ;
WRIGHT, DH .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1976, 21 (05) :781-791