Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics

被引:34
作者
Buttermann, Glenn R. [2 ]
Beaubien, Brian P. [1 ]
Freeman, Andrew L. [1 ]
Stoll, James E. [4 ]
Chappuis, James L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Midwest Orthopaed Res Fdn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[2] Midwest Spine Inst, Stillwater, MN 55082 USA
[3] Spine Ctr Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30309 USA
[4] Midwest Spine Ctr, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
关键词
Biomechanical; Cadaveric; Endplate; Flexibility; Interbody; Lumbar; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FACET SCREW FIXATION; IN-VITRO; PEDICLE SCREWS; LUMBAR SPINE; FUSION CAGES; THREADED CAGES; ROTATIONAL STABILITY; POSTERIOR FIXATION; PARASPINAL MUSCLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Stand-alone nonbiologic interbody fusion devices for the lumbar spine have been used for interbody fusion since the early 1990s. However, most devices lack the stability found in clinically successful circumferential fusion constructs. Stability results from cage geometry and device/vertebral endplate interface integrity. To date, there has not been a published comparative biomechanical study specifically evaluating the effects of endplate engagement of interbody devices. PURPOSE: Lumbar motion segments implanted with three different interbody devices were tested biomechanically to compare the effects of endplate engagement on motion segment rigidity. The degree of additional effect of supplemental posterior and anterior fixation was also investigated. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A cadaveric study of interbody fusion devices with varying degrees of endplate interdigitation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Implanted motion segment range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), stiffness, and disc height. METHODS: Eighteen human L23 and L45 motion segments were distributed into three interbody groups (n=6 each) receiving a polymeric (polyetheretherketone) interbody spacer with small ridges; a modular interbody device with endplate spikes (InFix, Abbott Spine, Austin, TX, USA); or dual tapered threaded interbody cages (LT [Lordotic tapered] cage; Medtronic, Memphis, TN, USA). Specimens were tested intact using a 7.5-Nm flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion flexibility protocol. Testing was repeated after implantation of the interbody device, anterior plate fixation, and posterior interpedicular fixation. Radiographic measurements determined changes in disc height and intervertebral lordosis. ROM and NZ were calculated and compared using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The interbody cages with endplate spikes or threads provided a statistically greater increase in disc height versus the polymer spacer (p=.01). Relative to intact, all stand-alone devices significantly reduced ROM in lateral bending by a mean 37% to 61% (p <=.001). The cages with endplate spikes or threads reduced ROM by similar to 50% and NZ by similar to 60% in flexion-extension (p <=.02). Only the cage with endplate spikes provided a statistically significant reduction in axial torsion ROM compared with the intact state (50% decrease, p<.001). Posterior fixation provided a significant reduction in ROM in all directions versus the interbody device alone (p<.001). Anterior plating decreased ROM over interbody device alone in flexion-extension and torsion but did not have additional effect on lateral bending ROM. CONCLUSION: The cages with endplate spikes or threads provide substantial motion segment rigidity compared with intact in bending modes. Only the cages with endplate spikes were more rigid than intact in torsion. All devices experienced increased rigidity with anterior plating and even greater rigidity with posterior fixation. It appears that the endplate engagement with spikes may be beneficial in limiting torsion, which is generally difficult with other "stand-alone" devices tested in the current and prior reports. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 573
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]
Mid-term migration of a cemented total hip replacement assessed by radiostereometric analysis [J].
Alfaro-Adrian, J ;
Gill, HS ;
Marks, BE ;
Murray, DW .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1999, 23 (03) :140-144
[2]
In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws [J].
Beaubien, BP ;
Derincek, A ;
Lew, WD ;
Wood, KB .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (16) :1846-1851
[3]
Posterior augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion -: Minimally invasive fixation versus pedicle screws in vitro [J].
Beaubien, BP ;
Mehbod, AA ;
Kallemeier, PM ;
Lew, WD ;
Buttermann, GR ;
Transfeldt, EE ;
Wood, KB .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (19) :E406-E412
[4]
Biomechanical comparison of anterolateral plate, lateral plate, and pedicle screws-rods for enhancing anterolateral lumbar interbody cage stabilization [J].
Bozkus, H ;
Chamberlain, RH ;
Garza, LEP ;
Crawford, NR ;
Dickman, CA .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (06) :635-641
[5]
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for the management of chronic lower back pain: current strategies and concepts [J].
Burkus, JK ;
Schuler, TC ;
Gornet, MF ;
Zdeblick, TA .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 35 (01) :25-+
[6]
Biomechanical analysis of posterior fixation techniques in a 360° arthrodesis model [J].
Burton, D ;
McIff, T ;
Fox, T ;
Lark, R ;
Asher, MA ;
Glattes, RC .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (24) :2765-2771
[7]
Button Gavin, 2005, Spine J, V5, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.021
[8]
Biomechanics of Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.: Part 2:: Treatment with threaded interbody cages/dowels and pedicle screws [J].
Çagli, S ;
Crawford, NR ;
Sonntag, VKH ;
Dickman, CA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 94 (01) :51-60
[9]
A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: Biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques [J].
Cain, CMJ ;
Schleicher, P ;
Gerlach, R ;
Pflugmacher, R ;
Scholz, M ;
Kandziora, F .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) :2631-2636
[10]
Anterolateral dynamized instrumentation and fusion for unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures [J].
Carl, AL ;
Tranmer, BI ;
Sachs, BL .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (06) :686-690