Patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with fentanyl in phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia

被引:29
作者
Aydin, ON
Kir, E
Özkan, SB
Gürsoy, F
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Aydin, Turkey
[2] Adnan Menderes Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Aydin, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01429-3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effects of intravenous (IV) patient-controlled sedation/analgesia with fentanyl during phacoemulsification surgery under topical anesthesia. Setting: Adnan Menderes University Medical School, Departments of Ophthalmology and Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Aydin, Turkey. Methods: In this double-blind randomized study, 68 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. In the fentanyl group comprising 34 patients, fentanyl was administered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) equipment in 5 mug bolus doses with a lockout period of 5 minutes after an IV loading dose of 0.7 mug/kg in 2 mL balanced salt solution. In the control group comprising 34 patients, a balanced salt solution was given without an analgesic drug by PCA equipment. Verbal pain scale (VPS) and sedation scores were recorded preoperatively and 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after the start of surgery. Patient comfort and surgeon satisfaction were assessed postoperatively. Results: The sedation score was higher in the fentanyl group than in the control group at 5 and 10 minutes (P = .006 and P = .012, respectively). The VPS scores were higher in the control group than in the fentanyl group at 15 and 20 minutes (P = .02 and P = .016, respectively). Patients pressed the button for additional analgesia 2.6 times +/- 3.9 (SD) in the control group and 0.9 +/- 1.6 times in the fentanyl group (P = .025). Patient and surgeon satisfaction were higher in the fentanyl group than the control group (P = .023 and P = .018, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that IV PCA with fentanyl has supplemental effects on analgesia and sedation during cataract surgery under topical anesthesia and increases patient comfort and surgeon satisfaction. (C) 2002 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1968 / 1972
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Prospective evaluation of topical versus retrobulbar anesthesia: A converting surgeon's experience [J].
Patel, BCK ;
Clinch, TE ;
Burns, TA ;
Shomaker, ST ;
Jessen, R ;
Crandall, AS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (06) :853-860
[22]   A comparison of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery [J].
Patel, BCK ;
Burns, TA ;
Crandall, A ;
Shomaker, ST ;
Pace, NL ;
vanEerd, A ;
Clinch, T .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (08) :1196-1203
[23]   INTRAOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION - COMPARISON OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED PROPOFOL WITH PATIENT-CONTROLLED MIDAZOLAM [J].
RUDKIN, GE ;
OSBORNE, GA ;
FINN, BP ;
JARVIS, DA ;
VICKERS, D .
ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (05) :376-381
[24]   INTRAVENOUS SEDATION FOR OCULAR SURGERY UNDER LOCAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
SALMON, JF ;
METS, B ;
JAMES, MFM ;
MURRAY, ADN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 76 (10) :598-601
[25]  
SULLIVAN KL, 1983, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V90, P373
[26]   PREMEDICATION FOR OUTPATIENT CATARACT-SURGERY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF INTRAMUSCULAR ALFENTANIL, MIDAZOLAM AND PLACEBO [J].
VIRKKILA, MEJ ;
ALIMELKKILA, TM ;
KANTO, JH .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 36 (06) :559-563
[27]   Pain in scleral pocket incision cataract surgery using topical and peribulbar anesthesia [J].
Virtanen, P ;
Huha, T .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (12) :1609-1613
[28]   SEDATION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM [J].
WILSON, E ;
DAVID, A ;
MACKENZIE, N ;
GRANT, IS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (01) :48-52
[29]   Topical versus peribulbar anesthesia in clear corneal cataract surgery [J].
Zehetmayer, M ;
Radax, U ;
Skorpik, C ;
Menapace, R ;
Schemper, M ;
Weghaupt, H ;
Scholz, U .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (04) :480-484