Endogenetic structure of filter bubble in social networks

被引:22
作者
Min, Yong [1 ]
Jiang, Tingjun [1 ]
Jin, Cheng [2 ]
Li, Qu [1 ]
Jin, Xiaogang [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Tencent Corp, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE | 2019年 / 6卷 / 11期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
social network; polarization; echo chamber; controlled experiment; privacy protection; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; NEWS; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.190868
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The filter bubble is an intermediate structure to provoke polarization and echo chambers in social networks, and it has become one of today's most urgent issues for social media. Previous studies usually equated filter bubbles with community structures and emphasized this exogenous isolation effect, but there is a lack of full discussion of the internal organization of filter bubbles. Here, we design an experiment for analysing filter bubbles taking advantage of social bots. We deployed 128 bots to Weibo (the largest microblogging network in China), and each bot consumed a specific topic (entertainment or sci-tech) and ran for at least two months. In total, we recorded about 1.3 million messages exposed to these bots and their social networks. By analysing the text received by the bots and motifs in their social networks, we found that a filter bubble is not only a dense community of users with the same preferences but also presents an endogenetic unidirectional star-like structure. The structure could spontaneously exclude non-preferred information and cause polarization. Moreover, our work proved that the felicitous use of artificial intelligence technology could provide a useful experimental approach that combines privacy protection and controllability in studying social media.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Should we worry about filter bubbles?
    Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen
    Trilling, Damian
    Moller, Judith
    Bodo, Balazs
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    Helberger, Natali
    [J]. INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2016, 5 (01):
  • [12] An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior
    Centola, Damon
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6060) : 1269 - 1272
  • [13] The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment
    Centola, Damon
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5996) : 1194 - 1197
  • [14] Online Social Interactions: A Natural Experiment on Word of Mouth Versus Observational Learning
    Chen, Yubo
    Wang, Qi
    Xie, Jinhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (02) : 238 - 254
  • [15] Automatic controversy detection in social media: A content-independent motif-based approach
    Coletto M.
    Garimella K.
    Gionis A.
    Lucchese C.
    [J]. Online Social Networks and Media, 2017, 3-4 : 22 - 31
  • [16] Conover M. D., 2011, 5 INT AAAI C WEBL SO
  • [17] Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization
    Dandekar, Pranav
    Goel, Ashish
    Lee, David T.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (15) : 5791 - 5796
  • [18] ON THE MEASUREMENT OF POLARIZATION
    ESTEBAN, JM
    RAY, D
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (04) : 819 - 851
  • [19] Clustering in complex directed networks
    Fagiolo, Giorgio
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2007, 76 (02)
  • [20] The Rise of Social Bots
    Ferrara, Emilio
    Varol, Onur
    Davis, Clayton
    Menczer, Filippo
    Flammini, Alessandro
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2016, 59 (07) : 96 - 104