Growth and characterization of CdTe/Si heterostructures - effect of substrate orientation

被引:36
作者
Smith, DJ [1 ]
Tsen, SCY
Chandrasekhar, D
Crozier, PA
Rujirawat, S
Brill, G
Chen, YP
Sporken, R
Sivananthan, S
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Solid State Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Phys, Microphys Lab, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[4] EPIR Ltd, Romeoville, IL 60446 USA
[5] Fac Univ Notre Dame Paix, Lab Interdisciplinaire Spect Elect, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
来源
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING B-SOLID STATE MATERIALS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 2000年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
growth; characterization; CdTe/Si heterostructures; substrate orientation;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00480-3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Transmission electron microscopy and small-probe microanalysis have been used to compare the microstructure and compositional profiles of CdTe/Si heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (001), (211) and (111) silicon substrates. Overall, our results have demonstrated that the final CdTe growth orientation is determined by careful preparation of the Si substrate surface, the nature of the interfacial layer, and the initial phase nucleation. Initial studies confirmed that growth on (001) was problematical, not only because of the large lattice mismatch between materials (approximately 19%), but also because the double-domain reconstruction of the Si substrate surface degraded epilayer quality. Growth of high quality, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved by offcutting the substrate with respect to the [110] surface direction, with an additional rotation about [110]. Alternatively, with intermediary buffer layers of Ge(001), perfect a/2[110] Lomer edge dislocations accommodated the misfit at the CdTe/Ge interface, and the (001) orientation of the Si substrate was retained during CdTe growth. For (211)-oriented substrates a very thin (approximately 2 nm) buffer layer of ZnTe prior to CdTe deposition was sufficient to maintain the substrate orientation, although Zn diffusion was often observed during subsequent annealing. The growth of Cd1-xZnxTe(211)B (with x similar to 2-4%) with intermediary CdTe buffer layers then provided substrates which were suitably lattice-matched for growth of HgCdTe, Finally, large-area, domain-free CdTe(111)B was achieved using As-passivated Si(111) substrates and thin (approximately 50 nm) ZnTe buffer layers. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Growth of high quality CdTe on Si substrates by molecular beam epitaxy [J].
Almeida, LA ;
Chen, YP ;
Faurie, JP ;
Sivananthan, S ;
Smith, DJ ;
Tsen, SCY .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 1996, 25 (08) :1402-1405
[2]   GROWTH OF (100) ORIENTED CDTE ON SI USING GE AS A BUFFER LAYER [J].
BHAT, I ;
WANG, WS .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 1994, 64 (05) :566-568
[3]  
BRILL G, IN PRESS J ELECT MAT
[4]   STRUCTURE OF CDTE(111)B GROWN BY MBE ON MISORIENTED SI(001) [J].
CHEN, YP ;
SIVANANTHAN, S ;
FAURIE, JP .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 1993, 22 (08) :951-957
[5]   DIRECT MOLECULAR-BEAM EPITAXIAL-GROWTH OF ZNTE(100) AND CDZNTE(100)/ZNTE(100) ON SI(100) SUBSTRATES [J].
DELYON, TJ ;
ROTH, JA ;
WU, OK ;
JOHNSON, SM ;
COCKRUM, CA .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 1993, 63 (06) :818-820
[6]   MOLECULAR-BEAM EPITAXIAL-GROWTH OF CDTE(112) ON SI(112) SUBSTRATES [J].
DELYON, TJ ;
RAJAVEL, D ;
JOHNSON, SM ;
COCKRUM, CA .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 1995, 66 (16) :2119-2121
[7]   HETEROEPITAXY OF CDTE ON GAAS AND SILICON SUBSTRATES [J].
FAURIE, JP ;
SPORKEN, R ;
CHEN, YP ;
LANGE, MD ;
SIVANANTHAN, S .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING B-SOLID STATE MATERIALS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 16 (1-3) :51-56
[8]  
KERN W, 1970, RCA REV, V31, P187
[9]   CADMIUM TELLURIDE THIN-FILMS ON SILICON SUBSTRATES [J].
KUO, TC ;
CHI, YT ;
GHOSH, PK ;
KORNREICH, PG ;
BEASOCK, J .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 1991, 197 (1-2) :107-115
[10]   PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF CDTE GROWN ON SI BY LOW-PRESSURE METALORGANIC CHEMICAL VAPOR-DEPOSITION [J].
LIN, MS ;
CHOU, RL ;
CHOU, KS .
JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH, 1986, 77 (1-3) :475-479