Hammond behavior versus ground state effects in protein folding:: Evidence for narrow free energy barriers and residual structure in unfolded states

被引:125
作者
Sánchez, IE [1 ]
Kiefhaber, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Biozentrum, Dept Biophys Chem, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
protein folding; Hammond postulate; transition state; unfolded state; cross-interaction parameters;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00171-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Apparent transition state movement upon mutation or changes in solvent conditions is frequently observed in protein folding and is often interpreted in terms of Hammond behavior. This led to the conclusion that barrier regions in protein folding are broad maxima on the free energy landscape. Here, we use the concept of self-interaction and cross-interaction parameters to test experimental data of 21 well-characterized proteins for Hammond behavior. This allows us to characterize the origin of transition state movements along different reaction coordinates. Only one of the 21 proteins shows a small but coherent transition state movement in agreement with the Hammond postulate. In most proteins the structure of the transition state is insensitive to changes in protein stability. The apparent change in the position of the transition state upon mutation, which is frequently observed in phi-value analysis, is in most cases due to ground-state effects caused by structural changes in the unfolded state. This argues for significant residual structure in unfolded polypeptide chains of many proteins. Disruption of these residual interactions by mutation often leads to decreased folding rates, which implies that these interactions are still present in the transition state. The failure to detect Hammond behavior shows that the free energy barriers encountered by a folding polypeptide chain are generally rather narrow and robust maxima for all experimentally explorable reaction coordinates. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 884
页数:18
相关论文
共 83 条
[61]   The changing nature of the protein folding transition state: Implications for the shape of the free-energy profile for folding [J].
Oliveberg, M ;
Tan, YJ ;
Silow, M ;
Fersht, AR .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 277 (04) :933-943
[62]   Denaturant-induced movement of the transition state of protein folding revealed by high-pressure stopped-flow measurements [J].
Pappenberger, G ;
Saudan, C ;
Becker, M ;
Merbach, AE ;
Kiefhaber, T .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (01) :17-22
[63]   Role of the chain termini for the folding transition state of the cold shock protein [J].
Perl, D ;
Holtermann, G ;
Schmid, FX .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 40 (51) :15501-15511
[64]   Limited internal friction in the rate-limiting step of a two-state protein folding reaction [J].
Plaxco, KW ;
Baker, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (23) :13591-13596
[65]   TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE OF KINETICS OF FOLDING OF CHYMOTRYPSINOGEN-A [J].
POHL, FM .
FEBS LETTERS, 1976, 65 (03) :293-296
[66]   CONTRIBUTION OF HYDRATION AND NONCOVALENT INTERACTIONS TO THE HEAT-CAPACITY EFFECT ON PROTEIN UNFOLDING [J].
PRIVALOV, PL ;
MAKHATADZE, GI .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 224 (03) :715-723
[67]   Non-linear rate-equilibrium free energy relationships and Hammond behavior in protein folding [J].
Sánchez, IE ;
Kiefhaber, T .
BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 100 (1-3) :397-407
[68]   Evidence for sequential barriers and obligatory intermediates in apparent two-state protein folding [J].
Sánchez, IE ;
Kiefhaber, T .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 325 (02) :367-376
[69]   UNFOLDING FREE-ENERGY CHANGES DETERMINED BY THE LINEAR EXTRAPOLATION METHOD .1. UNFOLDING OF PHENYLMETHANESULFONYL ALPHA-CHYMOTRYPSIN USING DIFFERENT DENATURANTS [J].
SANTORO, MM ;
BOLEN, DW .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 27 (21) :8063-8068
[70]   Structure and dynamics of an acid-denatured protein G mutant [J].
Sari, N ;
Alexander, P ;
Bryan, PN ;
Orban, J .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 39 (05) :965-977