Monte Carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator

被引:72
作者
Sterpin, E.
Tomsej, M.
De Smedt, B.
Reynaert, N.
Vynckier, S.
机构
[1] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Med Phys, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2727314
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) is a new pencil beam convolution/superposition algorithm proposed by Varian for photon dose calculations. The configuration of AAA depends on linear accelerator design and specifications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of AAA for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator for small fields and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments in inhomogeneous media. The accuracy of AAA was evaluated in two studies. First, AAA was compared both with Monte Carlo (MC) and the measurements in an inhomogeneous phantom simulating lung equivalent tissues and bone ribs. The algorithm was tested under lateral electronic disequilibrium conditions, using small fields (2 x 2 cm(2)). Good agreement was generally achieved for depth dose and profiles, with deviations generally below 3% in lung inhomogeneities and below 5% at interfaces. However, the effects of attenuation and scattering close to the bone ribs were not fully taken into account by AAA, and small inhomogeneities may lead to planning errors. Second, AAA and MC were compared for IMRT plans in clinical conditions, i.e., dose calculations in a computed tomography scan of a patient. One ethmoid tumor, one orophaxynx and two lung tumors are presented in this paper. Small differences were found between the dose volume histograms. For instance, a 1.7% difference for the mean planning target volume dose was obtained for the ethmoid case. Since better agreement was achieved for the same plans but in homogeneous conditions, these differences must be attributed to the handling of inhomogeneities by AAA. Therefore, inherent assumptions of the algorithm, principally the assumption of independent depth and lateral directions in the scaling of the kernels, were slightly influencing AAA's validity in inhomogeneities. However, AAA showed a good accuracy overall and a great ability to handle small fields in inhomogeneous media compared to other pencil beam convolution algorithms. (c) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1665 / 1677
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version [J].
Kawrakow, I .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) :485-498
[12]   LIMITATIONS OF A PENCIL BEAM APPROACH TO PHOTON DOSE CALCULATIONS IN LUNG-TISSUE [J].
KNOOS, T ;
AHNESJO, A ;
NILSSON, P ;
WEBER, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (09) :1411-1420
[13]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations [J].
Knoos, Tommy ;
Wieslander, Elinore ;
Cozzi, Luca ;
Brink, Carsten ;
Fogliata, Antonella ;
Albers, Dirk ;
Nystrom, Hakan ;
Lassen, Soren .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (22) :5785-5807
[14]   A dual source photon beam model used in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical megavoltage x-ray beams [J].
Liu, HH ;
Mackie, TR ;
McCullough, EC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :1960-1974
[15]   Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations [J].
Martens, C ;
Reynaert, N ;
De Wagter, C ;
Nilsson, P ;
Coghe, M ;
Palmans, H ;
Theirens, H ;
De Neve, W .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (07) :1528-1535
[16]   Dosimetric performance of an enhanced dose range radiographic film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance [J].
Olch, AJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (09) :2159-2168
[17]   Comparison of dose-volume histograms of IMRT treatment plans for ethmoid sinus cancer computed by advanced treatment planning systems including Monte Carlo [J].
Paelinck, Leen ;
De Smedt, Bart ;
Reynaert, Nick ;
Coghe, Marc ;
De Gersem, Werner ;
De Wagter, Carlos ;
Vanderstraeten, Barbara ;
Thierens, Hubert ;
De Neve, Wilfried .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 (03) :250-256
[18]   Predicting energy response of radiographic film in a 6 MV x-ray beam using Monte Carlo calculated fluence spectra and absorbed dose [J].
Palm, Å ;
Kirov, AS ;
LoSasso, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (12) :3168-3178
[19]   The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations [J].
Reynaert, N ;
Coghe, M ;
De Smedt, B ;
Paelinck, L ;
Vanderstraeten, B ;
De Gersem, W ;
Van Duyse, B ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, W ;
Thierens, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) :831-846
[20]   MCDE: a new Monte Carlo dose engine for IMRT [J].
Reynaert, N ;
De Smedt, B ;
Coghe, M ;
Paelinck, L ;
Van Duyse, B ;
De Gersem, W ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, W ;
Thierens, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (14) :N235-N241