Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception

被引:132
作者
Klein, William M. P. [1 ]
Stefanek, Michael E.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Behav Res Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer risk perceptions area key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 167
页数:21
相关论文
共 148 条
[11]   Pessimistic bias in comparative evaluations: A case of perceived vulnerability to the effects of negative life events [J].
Blanton, H ;
Axsom, D ;
McClive, KP ;
Price, S .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (12) :1627-1636
[12]   The statistics and probability curriculum at the secondary school level in the USA, Ireland and the UK [J].
Boland, PJ ;
Nicholson, J .
STATISTICIAN, 1996, 45 (04) :437-446
[13]   What do people's estimates of smoking related risk mean? [J].
Borland, R .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1997, 12 (04) :513-521
[14]   Rationality in medical treatment decisions: is there a sunk-cost effect? [J].
Bornstein, BH ;
Emler, AC ;
Chapman, GB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (02) :215-222
[15]   The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction [J].
Botti, S ;
Iyengar, SS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (03) :312-326
[16]   Finding positive meaning and its association with natural killer cell cytotoxicity among participants in a bereavement-related disclosure intervention [J].
Bower, JE ;
Kemeny, ME ;
Taylor, SE ;
Fahey, JL .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2003, 25 (02) :146-155
[17]  
BREWER NT, IN PRESS HLTH PSYCHO
[18]   Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: How presentation of recurrence risk influences decision-making [J].
Chao, C ;
Studts, JL ;
Abell, T ;
Hadley, T ;
Roetzer, L ;
Dineen, S ;
Lorenz, D ;
YoussefAgha, A ;
McMasters, KM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (23) :4299-4305
[19]   Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Johnson, EJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1999, 79 (02) :115-153
[20]   GENESIS OF POPULAR BUT ERRONEOUS PSYCHO-DIAGNOSTIC OBSERVATIONS [J].
CHAPMAN, LJ ;
CHAPMAN, JP .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 72 (03) :193-&