Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception

被引:132
作者
Klein, William M. P. [1 ]
Stefanek, Michael E.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Behav Res Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer risk perceptions area key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 167
页数:21
相关论文
共 148 条
[21]  
CHRISTENSEN C, 2000, DECISION MAKING HLTH, P267
[22]   Living with treatment decisions: Regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer [J].
Clark, JA ;
Wray, NP ;
Ashton, CM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (01) :72-80
[23]  
Cranney M, 1996, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V46, P661
[24]   PSYCHOLOGICAL MINIMIZATION OF CHOLESTEROL TEST-RESULTS - MODERATORS OF APPRAISAL IN COLLEGE-STUDENTS AND COMMUNITY RESIDENTS [J].
CROYLE, RT ;
SUN, YC ;
LOUIE, DH .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 12 (06) :503-507
[25]  
Damasio A.R., 1994, DESCARTES ERROR EMOT
[26]   SYSTEMATIC-ERRORS IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING - JUDGMENT LIMITATIONS [J].
DAWSON, NV ;
ARKES, HR .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 2 (03) :183-187
[27]   CONFLICT BETWEEN INTUITIVE AND RATIONAL PROCESSING - WHEN PEOPLE BEHAVE AGAINST THEIR BETTER JUDGMENT [J].
DENESRAJ, V ;
EPSTEIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (05) :819-829
[28]   Unrealistic optimism in smokers: Implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation [J].
Dillard, AJ ;
McCaul, KD ;
Klein, WMP .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2006, 11 :93-102
[29]   Resisting good news: Reactions to breast cancer risk communication [J].
Dillard, AJ ;
McCaul, KD ;
Kelso, PD ;
Klein, WMP .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2006, 19 (02) :115-123
[30]   Putting adjustment sack in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors [J].
Epley, N ;
Gilovich, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (05) :391-396