Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception

被引:132
作者
Klein, William M. P. [1 ]
Stefanek, Michael E.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Behav Res Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer risk perceptions area key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 167
页数:21
相关论文
共 148 条
[51]   The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: A theoretical and empirical review of the literature [J].
Hay, JL ;
Buckley, TR ;
Ostroff, JS .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (07) :517-534
[52]   CULTURAL VARIATION IN UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM - DOES THE WEST FEEL MORE INVULNERABLE THAN THE EAST [J].
HEINE, SJ ;
LEHMAN, DR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (04) :595-607
[53]   Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature [J].
Helweg-Larsen, M ;
Shepperd, JA .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 5 (01) :74-95
[54]   Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer [J].
Hughes, C ;
Lerman, C ;
Lustbader, E .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 40 (01) :25-35
[55]   JUDGING HEALTH-STATUS - EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED PREVALENCE AND PERSONAL RELEVANCE [J].
JEMMOTT, JB ;
DITTO, PH ;
CROYLE, RT .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (05) :899-905
[56]   AFFECT, GENERALIZATION, AND THE PERCEPTION OF RISK [J].
JOHNSON, EJ ;
TVERSKY, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 45 (01) :20-31
[57]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[58]  
KELIN WMP, IN PRESS J AM COLL H
[59]   CONFIRMATION, DISCONFIRMATION, AND INFORMATION IN HYPOTHESIS-TESTING [J].
KLAYMAN, J ;
HA, YW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :211-228
[60]  
Klein W.M., 1997, HLTH COPING WELL BEI, P25