Power and loss aversion

被引:126
作者
Inesi, M. Ena [1 ]
机构
[1] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
关键词
Power; Loss aversion; Choice; Decision making; Anticipated value; Hedonic; Decision outcomes; Expected value; Approach; CHOICE; INHIBITION; EXPERIENCE; DECISION; SELF;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.01.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Four experiments tested the prediction that power reduces loss aversion by increasing the anticipated value of gains and shrinking the negative anticipated value of losses. Experiment 1 provided initial support for the prediction that those in power are less loss averse by replicating a classic paradigm of loss aversion in riskless choice and demonstrating moderation by power. Experiments 2 and 3 expanded on this finding by breaking apart the components of loss aversion to determine how power may reduce it: via gains, losses, or both. Across two scenarios and two different measures of anticipated value, power reduced the anticipated threat associated with a loss. However, the prediction that power increases the anticipated value of gains was not supported. Finally, Experiment 4 replicated the results of Experiments 2 and 3 in the context of a choice with real consequences for the participants. Implications of these findings are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 69
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]   Value from hedonic experience and engagement [J].
Higgins, E. Tory .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (03) :439-460
[32]   Beyond pleasure and pain [J].
Higgins, ET .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (12) :1280-1300
[33]   Transfer of value from fit [J].
Higgins, ET ;
Idson, LC ;
Freitas, AL ;
Spiegel, S ;
Molden, DC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (06) :1140-1153
[34]   Imagining how you'd feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit [J].
Idson, LC ;
Liberman, N ;
Higgins, ET .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (07) :926-937
[35]   POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF LOSS AVERSION [J].
JERVIS, R .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 13 (02) :187-204
[36]   CHOICES, VALUES, AND FRAMES [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (04) :341-350
[37]   ANOMALIES - THE ENDOWMENT EFFECT, LOSS AVERSION, AND STATUS-QUO BIAS [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 5 (01) :193-206
[38]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[39]  
Kahneman D., 2003, Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology
[40]   Power, approach, and inhibition [J].
Keltner, D ;
Gruenfeld, DH ;
Anderson, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :265-284