Yield enhancement in photolithography through model-based process control: Average mode control

被引:8
作者
Grosman, B [1 ]
Lachman-Shalem, S
Swissa, R
Lewin, DR
机构
[1] Technion Univ, Dept Chem Engn, PSE Res Grp, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[2] Tower Semicond Ltd, IL-10556 Migdal Ha Emek, Israel
关键词
genetic programming; model predictive control; multivariable control; photolithography CD control; process modeling;
D O I
10.1109/TSM.2004.836654
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes the fabrication facility (FAB) implementation of a multivariable nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) for the regulation of critical dimensions (CDs) in photolithography. The controller is based on nonlinear empirical models relating the stepper inputs, exposure dose and focus on the isolated and dense CDs measured by scanning electron microscopy. Since the adjustments are made on the basis of the average value of five measured points in each wafer, this is referred to as average mode control. The optimal structure and parameters of these empirical models were determined by genetic programming, to closely match FAB data. The tuning and testing of the NMPC regulator were facilitated by the use of a simulated photolithography track, using the KLA-Tencor-FINLE PROLITH package, suitably calibrated to match FAB conditions. On implementation in the FAB, the NMPC has been demonstrated to consistently maintain the CDs close to their setpoint values, despite unmeasured disturbances such as shifts in uncontrolled inputs. It was also shown that adopting the multivariable feedback regulatory strategy to regulate the CDs results in significant improvements in the die yield.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BYERS J, 2002, MICRO NANO ENG, P89
[2]   ADAPTIVE-CONTROL OF PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY [J].
CRISALLE, OD ;
SOPER, RA ;
MELLICHAMP, DA ;
SEBORG, DE .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1992, 38 (01) :1-14
[3]   CHARACTERIZATION OF POSITIVE PHOTORESIST [J].
DILL, FH ;
HORNBERGER, WP ;
HAUGE, PS ;
SHAW, JM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1975, ED22 (07) :445-452
[4]   Advanced process control: Benefits for photolithography process control [J].
Gould, C .
2002 IEEE/SEMI ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP: ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE, 2002, :98-100
[5]   Automated nonlinear model predictive control using genetic programming [J].
Grosman, B ;
Lewin, DR .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 26 (4-5) :631-640
[6]   Nonlinear modeling and multivariable control of photolithography [J].
Lachman-Shalem, S ;
Grosman, B ;
Lewin, DR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 2002, 15 (03) :310-322
[7]   A control system for photolithographic sequences [J].
Leang, SR ;
Ma, SY ;
Thomson, J ;
Bombay, BJ ;
Spanos, CJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 1996, 9 (02) :191-207
[8]   Automated photolithography critical dimension controls in a complex, mixed technology, manufacturing fab [J].
Schneider, C ;
Smyth, J ;
Watts, A .
2001 IEEE/SEMI ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE, 2001, :33-40
[9]   Lithography model tuning: Matching simulation to experiment [J].
Thornton, SH ;
Mack, CA .
OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY IX, 1996, 2726 :223-235
[10]   Run-to-run control methods based on the DHOBE algorithm [J].
Zhang, C ;
Deng, H ;
Baras, JS .
AUTOMATICA, 2003, 39 (01) :35-45