Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies

被引:28
作者
Georg, D [1 ]
Kroupa, B [1 ]
Winkler, P [1 ]
Pötter, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiobiol, Div Med Radiat Phys, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
film dosimetry; EDR-2; film; X-Omat V film; IMRT verification;
D O I
10.1118/1.1576951
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
With the clinical implementation of time-variable dose patterns and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) film dosimetry has regained popularity. Films are currently the most frequently used dosimetric means for patient specific quality assurance in IMRT. A common method is to verify a so-called hybrid IMRT plan, which is the patient specific treatment plan with unmodified fluence patterns recalculated in a dedicated phantom. For such applications the sensitometric curve, i.e., the relation between optical density (OD) and absorbed dose, should not depend critically on beam energy, field size and depth, or film orientation. In order to minimize the influence of all these variables a normalization of sensitometric curves is performed at various photon beam energies (6 MV, 10 MV, 25 MV). By doing so one unique sensitometric curve can be used for these three beam qualities. This holds for both film types investigated: Kodak X-Omat V films and EDR-2 films. Additionally, the influence of field size, depth and film orientation on a normalized sensitometric curve is determined for both film types. For doses smaller than 0.8 Gy for X-Omat V and doses smaller than 3 Gy for EDR-2 films the field size variation of normalized sensitometric curves is much smaller than 3% for fields up to 20x20 cm(2). For X-Omat V films all differences between sensitometric curves determined at depths of 5, 10, and 15 cm are smaller than 3%. For EDR-2 films deviations larger than 3% are only observed at low net OD smaller than 0.25. The dependence of film orientation (parallel versus perpendicular) on a normalized sensitometric curve is found to be not critical. However, processing conditions have the largest influence and can result in differences up to 20% for sensitometric curves derived from films of the same batch but using different film processors. When normalizing sensitometric curves to the dose value necessary to obtain a net OD=1 for that respective geometry and energy the large energy dependence of sensitometric curves can be almost eliminated. This becomes especially important for the verification of hybrid IMRT plans with multiple energies. Additionally, such a normalization minimizes other influences such as field size, depth, and film orientation. This method is generally applicable to both Kodak X-Omat V and EDR-2 films. In order to achieve the highest accuracy level an upper dose limit of 0.8 Gy for X-Omat V films and 3 Gy for EDR-2 films should be taken into account. However, these dose limits may vary with film reading instrument and film processor. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1150
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
GRANKE RC, 1952, AM J ROENTGENOL, V28, P207
[12]   PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM FOR DETERMINATION OF ISODOSE CURVES FROM BETATRON ELECTRON RADIATION [J].
HETTINGER, G ;
SVENSSON, H .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-THERAPY PHYSICS BIOLOGY, 1967, 6 (01) :74-+
[13]   A monitor unit verification calculation in intensity modulated radiotherapy as a dosimetry quality assurance [J].
Kung, JH ;
Chen, GTY ;
Kuchnir, FK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (10) :2226-2230
[14]   Phantoms for IMRT dose distribution measurement and treatment verification [J].
Low, DA ;
Gerber, RL ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (05) :1231-1235
[15]   A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions [J].
Low, DA ;
Harms, WB ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :656-661
[16]   The value of radiographic film for the characterization of intensity-modulated beams [J].
Martens, C ;
Claeys, I ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (13) :2221-2234
[17]   External audit of photon beams by mailed film dosimetry: Feasibility study [J].
Novotny, J ;
Gomola, I ;
Izewska, J ;
Huyskens, D ;
Dutreix, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (07) :1277-1288
[18]   Dosimetric performance of an enhanced dose range radiographic film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance [J].
Olch, AJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (09) :2159-2168
[19]  
SANG GJ, 2002, MED PHYS, V29, P351
[20]   Perturbation of radiotherapy beams by radiographic film: measurements and Monte Carlo simulations [J].
Suchowerska, N ;
Hoban, P ;
Davison, A ;
Metcalfe, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (07) :1755-1765