Gene therapy vectors: the prospects and potentials of the cut-and-paste transposons

被引:29
作者
Bouuaert, Corentin Claeys [1 ]
Chalmers, Ronald M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biomed Sci, Queens Med Ctr, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Gene therapy; Transposon; Transposition; Genetic disease; DNA recombination; Transformation; SLEEPING-BEAUTY TRANSPOSITION; TARGET SITE SELECTION; V(D)J RECOMBINATION; TN10; TRANSPOSITION; MARINER TRANSPOSASE; SYNAPTIC COMPLEX; IN-VITRO; BINDING DOMAIN; ACTIVE-SITE; BACTERIAL TRANSPOSITION;
D O I
10.1007/s10709-009-9391-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Gene therapy applications require efficient tools for the stable delivery of genetic information into eukaryotic genomes. Most current gene delivery strategies are based on viral vectors. However, a number of drawbacks, such as the limited cargo capacity, host immune response and mutational risks, highlight the need for alternative gene delivery tools. A comprehensive gene therapy tool kit should contain a range of vectors and techniques that can be adapted to different targets and purposes. Transposons provide a potentially powerful approach. However, transposons encompass a large number of different molecular mechanisms, some of which are better suited to gene delivery applications than others. Here, we consider the range and potentials of the various mechanisms, focusing on the cut-and-paste transposons as one of the more promising avenues towards gene therapy applications. Several cut-and-paste transposition systems are currently under development. We will first consider the mechanisms of piggyBac and the hAT family elements Tol1 and Tol2, before focusing on the mariner family elements including Mos1, Himar1 and Hsmar1.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 484
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis [J].
Aldaz, H ;
Schuster, E ;
Baker, TA .
CELL, 1996, 85 (02) :257-269
[2]  
ATKINSON H, 2009, GENETICA IN PRESS
[3]   Mariner Mos1 transposase dimerizes prior to ITR binding [J].
Augé-Gouillou, C ;
Brillet, B ;
Germon, S ;
Hamelin, MH ;
Bigot, Y .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 351 (01) :117-130
[4]   Assembly of the mariner Mos1 synaptic complex [J].
Augé-Gouillou, C ;
Brillet, B ;
Hamelin, MH ;
Bigot, Y .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 25 (07) :2861-2870
[5]   The ITR binding domain of the mariner Mos-1 transposase [J].
Augé-Gouillou, C ;
Hamelin, MH ;
Demattei, MV ;
Periquet, G ;
Bigot, Y .
MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2001, 265 (01) :58-65
[6]   PROTEIN-DNA ASSEMBLIES CONTROLLING LYTIC DEVELOPMENT OF BACTERIOPHAGE-MU [J].
BAKER, TA .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 3 (05) :708-712
[7]   Mechanism of IS200/IS605 family DNA transposases:: Activation and transposon-directed target site selection [J].
Barabas, Orsolya ;
Ronning, Donald R. ;
Guynet, Catherine ;
Hickman, Alison Burgess ;
Ton-Hoang, Bao ;
Chandler, Michael ;
Dyda, Fred .
CELL, 2008, 132 (02) :208-220
[8]  
Bessereau Jean-Louis, 2006, V351, P59
[9]   Hairpin formation in Tn5 transposition [J].
Bhasin, A ;
Goryshin, IY ;
Reznikoff, WS .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 274 (52) :37021-37029
[10]   Base-flipping dynamics in a DNA hairpin processing reaction [J].
Bischerour, Julien ;
Chalmers, Ronald .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2007, 35 (08) :2584-2595