Comparison of Real-time Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced Elliptic Centric-ordered MR Venography and Two-dimensional Time-of-flight MR Venography of the Intracranial Venous System

被引:26
作者
Fu, Jui-Hsun
Lai, Ping-Hong [1 ]
Hsiao, Chia-Chi
Li, Shang-Chieh
Weng, Mei-Jui
Wang, Po-Ching
Chen, Clement Kuen-Huang
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
关键词
intracranial venous system; magnetic resonance venography; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70027-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: To compare 3-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced elliptic centric-ordered (3D GEC) magnetic resonance venography (MRV) with traditional 2-dimensional time-of-flight (2D TOF) MRV for imaging of the intracranial venous system. Methods: Fifty-three patients underwent 2D and 3D MRV, whereby venous structures were evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists. Results: Of the 53 patients, 10 were diagnosed with dural venous sinus thrombosis and 12 with intracranial tumors. 3D GEC MRV displayed superior sensitivity/specificity (90.9%/96.8%) compared to 2D TOE MRV (63.6%/48.4%). Analysis of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves also showed superiority of 3D GEC (0.91) versus 20 TOE (0.53) MRV. Of the remaining 31 healthy patients, the rate of complete visibility of venous structures was also greater for 3D GEC (95.8%) than for 2D TOE (62.1%) MRV. Conclusion: 3D GEC MRV is superior to 2D TOE MRV for providing more detail of the intracranial venous system, and can lead to better diagnosis of venous conditions. [J Chin Med Assoc 2010;73(3):131-138]
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 138
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
Ayanzen RH, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P74
[2]
Role of contrast-enhanced MR venography in the preoperative evaluation of parasagittal meningiomas [J].
Bozzao, A ;
Finocchi, V ;
Romano, A ;
Ferrante, M ;
Fasoli, F ;
Trillò, G ;
Ferrante, L ;
Fantozzi, LM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (09) :1790-1796
[3]
Intracranial venous system: Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-trigered elliptic centric-ordered sequence - Initial experience [J].
Farb, RI ;
Scott, JN ;
Willinsky, RA ;
Montanera, W ;
Wright, GA ;
terBrugge, KG .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) :203-209
[4]
Huston J, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V218, P138
[5]
More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: Comparison of three MR angiographic techniques [J].
Kirchhof, K ;
Welzel, T ;
Jansen, O ;
Sartor, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :804-810
[6]
Comparative evaluation of 2D time-of-flight and 3D elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR venography in patients with presumptive cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis [J].
Klingebiel, R. ;
Bauknecht, H. C. ;
Bohner, G. ;
Kirsch, R. ;
Berger, J. ;
Masuhr, F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) :139-143
[7]
Preoperative evaluation of venous systems with 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in brain tumors: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance venography and digital subtraction angiography [J].
Lee, JM ;
Jung, S ;
Moon, KS ;
Seo, JJ ;
Kim, IY ;
Jung, TY ;
Lee, JK ;
Kang, SS .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (02) :128-134
[8]
MR angiography of the intracranial venous system [J].
Liauw, L ;
van Buchem, MA ;
Spilt, A ;
de Bruïne, FT ;
van den Berg, R ;
Hermans, J ;
Wasser, MNJM .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (03) :678-682
[9]
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: Practical review for radiologists [J].
Park, SH ;
Goo, JM ;
Jo, CH .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (01) :11-18
[10]
Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature [J].
Willinsky, RA ;
Taylor, SM ;
terBrugge, K ;
Farb, RI ;
Tomlinson, G ;
Montanera, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) :522-528