Selection criteria for drug-like compounds

被引:317
作者
Muegge, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Bayer Res Ctr, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
关键词
library design; neural network; decision tree; drug database; non-drug; diversity; POLAR MOLECULAR-SURFACE; COMBINATORIAL LIBRARIES; STRUCTURAL FEATURES; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; CHEMICAL DATABASES; POTENTIAL-DRUGS; PREDICTION; DIVERSITY; DESIGN; CHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1002/med.10041
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The fast identification of quality lead compounds in the pharmaceutical industry through a combination of high throughput synthesis and screening has become more challenging in recent years. Although the number of available compounds for high throughput screening (HTS) has dramatically increased, large-scale random combinatorial libraries have contributed proportionally less to identify novel leads for drug discovery projects. Therefore, the concept of 'drug-likeness' of compound selections has become a focus in recent years. In parallel, the low success rate of converting lead compounds into drugs often due to unfavorable pharmacokinetic parameters has sparked a renewed interest in understanding more clearly what makes a compound drug-like. Various approaches have been devised to address the drug-likeness of molecules employing retrospective analyses of known drug collections as well as attempting to capture 'chemical wisdom' in algorithms. For example, simple property counting schemes, machine learning methods, regression models, and clustering methods have been employed to distinguish between drugs and non-drugs. Here we review computational techniques to address the drug-likeness of compound selections and offer an outlook for the further development of the field. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 23 No. 3, 302-321, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 321
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
[21]   General topological patterns of known drugs [J].
Gálvez, J ;
de Julián-Ortiz, JV ;
García-Domenech, R .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2001, 20 (01) :84-94
[22]   A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases [J].
Ghose, AK ;
Viswanadhan, VN ;
Wendoloski, JJ .
JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 1 (01) :55-68
[23]   Selecting combinatorial libraries to optimize diversity and physical properties [J].
Gillet, VJ ;
Willett, P ;
Bradshaw, J ;
Green, DVS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1999, 39 (01) :169-177
[24]   Identification of biological activity profiles using substructural analysis and genetic algorithms [J].
Gillet, VJ ;
Willett, P ;
Bradshaw, J .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1998, 38 (02) :165-179
[25]  
Hall L.H., 1991, REVCOMPUT CHEM, V2, P367, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470125793.CH9
[26]   Strategic pooling of compounds for high-throughput screening [J].
Hann, M ;
Hudson, B ;
Lewell, X ;
Lifely, R ;
Miller, L ;
Ramsden, N .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1999, 39 (05) :897-902
[27]  
Henkel T, 1999, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V38, P643, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990301)38:5<643::AID-ANIE643>3.0.CO
[28]  
2-G
[29]   Polar molecular surface as a dominating determinant for oral absorption and brain penetration of drugs [J].
Kelder, J ;
Grootenhuis, PDJ ;
Bayada, DM ;
Delbressine, LPC ;
Ploemen, JP .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 16 (10) :1514-1519
[30]   APPROACHES TO SAR IN CARCINOGENESIS AND MUTAGENESIS - PREDICTION OF CARCINOGENICITY/MUTAGENICITY USING MULTI-CASE [J].
KLOPMAN, G ;
ROSENKRANZ, HS .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1994, 305 (01) :33-46