Relationships between soil test phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, and phosphorus saturation in Delaware soils

被引:224
作者
Pautler, MC [1 ]
Sims, JT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Newark, DE 19717 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2000.642765x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Methods to identify agricultural soils that contribute to nonpoint-source pollution of surface waters by P are of increasing importance, particularly in areas with high animal densities (animal units per hectare of cropland). Our objective was to determine the relationship between agronomic: soil test P (STP = Mehlich 1) and other soil P tests proposed to measure the potential for P loss by erosion, runoff, and leaching. We compared STP with soluble P, P in the "fast desorbing pool" (strip P), and soil P saturation for 127 soils (122 from Delaware and five from the Netherlands). Soil test P was significantly correlated with total P (r = 0.57***, significant at the 0.001 level), soluble P (r = 0.71***), strip P (r = 0.84***), and oxalate-extractable P (P-ox; r = 0.84***). Strip P was a better predictor of soluble P than STP (r(2) = 0.76***). The ratio of strip P/P-ox (the percentage of reversibly sorbed P in the fast desorbing pool) increased as P sorption capacity, estimated from oxalate-extractable Al and Fe (Al-ox + Fe-ox), decreased. We also determined the degree of P saturation (DPS) using three methods: Langmuir P sorption isotherms; oxalate extractions of P, Al, and Fe; and STP plus a single-point P sorption index (PSI). Soluble P, STP, and desorbable P increased for DPS values >30%, similar to upper DPS limits in the Netherlands and Belgium. Soils rated agronomically excessive in STP (>50 mg kg(-1)) had higher ratios of soluble P, strip P, and P-ox to total P than those in agronomically optimum or lower categories.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 773
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]  
*DEL DEP AGR, 1998, DEL AGR STAT SUMM 19
[12]  
DeSmet J, 1996, FERT RES, V43, P209, DOI 10.1007/BF00747704
[13]   Soil phosphorus management and water quality: a UK perspective [J].
Edwards, AC ;
Withers, PJA .
SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 14 :124-130
[14]   PHOSPHORUS SOIL TESTING - ENVIRONMENTAL USES AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
GARTLEY, KL ;
SIMS, JT .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1994, 25 (9-10) :1565-1582
[15]   A conceptual approach for integrating phosphorus and nitrogen management at watershed scales [J].
Heathwaite, L ;
Sharpley, A ;
Gburek, W .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (01) :158-166
[16]   PHOSPHORUS LEACHING FROM SOILS CONTAINING DIFFERENT PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE BROADBALK EXPERIMENT [J].
HECKRATH, G ;
BROOKES, PC ;
POULTON, PR ;
GOULDING, KWT .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1995, 24 (05) :904-910
[17]  
*IR ENV PROT AG, 1997, INT POLL CONTR LIC B
[18]  
Kuo S., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods., P869
[19]   THE CONCEPT AND NEED FOR A PHOSPHORUS ASSESSMENT-TOOL [J].
LEMUNYON, JL ;
GILBERT, RG .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1993, 6 (04) :483-486
[20]   Relationship between soil properties and phosphate saturation parameters - A transect study in northern Belgium [J].
Lookman, R ;
Jansen, K ;
Merckx, R ;
Vlassak, K .
GEODERMA, 1996, 69 (3-4) :265-274