Sample bias among women with retained DNA samples for future genetic studies

被引:17
作者
Aagaard-Tillery, Kjersti
Sibai, Baha
Spong, Catherine Y.
Momirova, Valerija
Wendel, George, Jr.
Wenstrom, Katharine
Samuels, Philip
Cotroneo, Margaret
Moawad, Atef
Sorokin, Yoram
Miodovnik, Menachem
Meis, Paul
O'Sullivan, Mary J.
Conway, Deborah
Wapner, Ronald J.
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] NICHHD, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Biostat Coordinating Ctr, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[5] Univ Texas San Antonio SW, Dept Obstet, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[6] Univ Texas San Antonio SW, Dept Gynecol, Dallas, TX USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[9] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[10] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[11] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[12] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[13] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[14] Univ Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[15] Univ Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78285 USA
[16] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000241536.19539.14
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether women who agree to future use of their biologic specimens for genetic studies reflect the larger study population from which they are derived. METHODS: Women were questioned as to the future disposition of their maternal and fetal DNA samples upon enrollment in a multicenter, observational study originally designed to identify factor V Leiden mutation carriers and prospectively ascertain the estimated rate of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism and adverse pregnancy outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses was carried out on the 5,003 of 5,188 enrolled women who indicated their desire regarding future disposition of their DNA samples. RESULTS: Among these 5,003 women, 20.1% desired that their samples be discarded and not available for future genetic studies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that women who agreed to subsequent use of samples were less likely African-American (odds ratio [OR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7) or Hispanic (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.5), and more likely to use tobacco (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.6) than those who desired that their samples be discarded. CONCLUSION: Genetic samples from women agreeing to their use in a sample repository may not be representative of the index study cohort. This should be considered in their subsequent interpretation and generalizability.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1120
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
Hood RG, 2000, J NATL MED ASSOC, V92, P417
[12]  
Hoyo C, 2003, ETHNIC DIS, V13, P470
[13]   The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer [J].
Jones, PA ;
Baylin, SB .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (06) :415-428
[14]   A qualitative study of subject recruitment for familial cancer research [J].
Kreiger, N ;
Ashbury, F ;
Cotterchio, M ;
Macey, J .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (04) :219-224
[15]   CHANGES IN STUDY DESIGN, GENDER ISSUES, AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH PUBLISHED IN 3 MAJOR MEDICAL JOURNALS FROM 1971 TO 1991 [J].
MCDERMOTT, MM ;
LEFEVRE, F ;
FEINGLASS, J ;
REIFLER, D ;
DOLAN, N ;
POTTS, S ;
SENGER, K .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 10 (01) :13-18
[16]   Consent for genetic research in a general population: The NHANES experience [J].
McQuillan, GM ;
Porter, KS ;
Agelli, M ;
Kington, R .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 5 (01) :35-42
[17]   Participation in cancer clinical trials - Race-, sex-, and age-based disparities [J].
Murthy, VH ;
Krumholz, HM ;
Gross, CP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (22) :2720-2726
[18]  
ROBERSON NL, 1994, CANCER, V74, P2687, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+<2687::AID-CNCR2820741817>3.0.CO
[19]  
2-B
[20]   Genetic research and health disparities [J].
Sankar, P ;
Cho, MK ;
Condit, CM ;
Hunt, LM ;
Koenig, B ;
Marshall, P ;
Lee, SSJ ;
Spicer, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (24) :2985-2989