Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis

被引:449
作者
Oosterbeek, H [1 ]
Sloof, R
Van de Kuilen, G
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tinbergen Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ultimatum game; meta-analysis; cultural differences;
D O I
10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reports the findings of a meta-analysis of 37 papers with 75 results from ultimatum game experiments. We. find that on average the proposer offers 40% of the pie to the responder. This share is smaller for larger pie sizes and larger when a strategy method is used or when subjects are inexperienced, On average 16% of the offers is rejected. The rejection rate is lower for larger pie sizes and for larger shares offered. Responders are less willing to accept an offer when the strategy method is employed. As the results come from different countries, meta-analysis provides an alternative way to investigate whether bargaining behavior in ultimatum games differs across countries. We find differences in behavior of responders (and not of proposers) across geographical regions. With one exception, these differences cannot be attributed to various cultural traits on which for instance the cultural classifications of Hofstede (1991) and Inglehart (2000) are based.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining [J].
Abbink, K ;
Bolton, GE ;
Sadrieh, A ;
Tang, FF .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2001, 37 (01) :1-25
[2]   Cultural differences in attitudes toward bargaining [J].
Anderson, LR ;
Rodgers, YV ;
Rodriguez, RR .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2000, 69 (01) :45-54
[3]  
[Anonymous], EC NOTES
[4]   The ultimatum game and non-selfish utility functions [J].
Bethwaite, J ;
Tompkinson, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 17 (02) :259-271
[5]   A backward induction experiment [J].
Binmore, K ;
McCarthy, J ;
Ponti, G ;
Samuelson, L ;
Shaked, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 104 (01) :48-88
[6]   WHEN SOCIAL OUTCOMES ARENT FAIR - THE EFFECT OF CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS ON PREFERENCES [J].
BLOUNT, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 63 (02) :131-144
[7]  
Bornstein G., 1998, EXPT EC, V1, P101, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009914001822
[8]   Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia [J].
Cameron, LA .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1999, 37 (01) :47-59
[9]   ARE ECONOMISTS DIFFERENT, AND IF SO, WHY [J].
CARTER, JR ;
IRONS, MD .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 5 (02) :171-177
[10]   A test for comparative income effects in an ultimatum bargaining experiment [J].
Carter, JR ;
McAloon, SA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1996, 31 (03) :369-380