Sensitivity of CMOS based imagers and scaling perspectives

被引:128
作者
Lulé, T
Benthien, S
Keller, H
Mütze, F
Rieve, P
Seibel, K
Sommer, M
Böhm, M
机构
[1] Silicon Vis GmbH, Automot Vis Grp, D-57078 Siegen, Germany
[2] Silicon Vis GmbH, Consumer Prod Grp, D-57078 Siegen, Germany
[3] Univ Siegen, Inst Halbleitertech, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
关键词
active pixel sensors; CMOS image sensors; ISO speed; PG; scaling; sensitivity; TFA;
D O I
10.1109/16.877173
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
CMOS based imagers are beginning to compete against CCDs in many areas of the consumer market because of their system-on-a-chip capability, Sensitivity, however, is a main weakness of CMOS imagers and enhancements and deviations from standard CMOS processes are necessary to keep up sensitivity with downscaled process generations. In the introductory section several definitions for the sensitivity of image sensors are reviewed with regard to their potential to allow meaningful comparison of different detector structures. In the main section, the standard CMOS sensor architecture is compared to detector structures designed to improve the sensitivity, namely the photogate (PG), the pinned photodiode (PPD) and the thin film on ASIC (TFA) approach. The latter uses a vertical integration of the photodiode on top of the pixel transistors. A careful analysis of the relevant electrical, optical and technological parameters and many previously published experimental data for different imagers reveals that only the PPD and the TFA enhancements provide satisfactory sensitivity and withstand scaling down to 0.18 mu processes. Due to the higher fill factor and the higher quantum efficiency TFA provides significantly better values than PPD, The radiometric sensitivity of a 5 mum x 5 mum TFA pixel is found to amount to 11.9 V/(muJ/cm(2)) for a 0.25 mum process and 27.5 V/(muJ/cm(2)) for a 0.18 mum process.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2122
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
AGWANI S, 1999, P 1999 IEEE WORKSH C, P21
[2]  
ASAI A, 1997, P 1997 IEEE WORKSH C, pR9
[3]  
BARNA SL, 1999, P IEEE WORKSH CHARG, P148
[4]  
BENTHIEN S, 1999, P IEEE WORKSH CHARG, P64
[5]   Noise performance of a color CMOS photogate image sensor [J].
Blanksby, AJ ;
Loinaz, MJ ;
Inglis, DA ;
Ackland, BD .
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING - 1997, TECHNICAL DIGEST, 1997, :205-208
[6]   Noise analysis of imagers with a-Si:H pin diode pixels [J].
Blecher, F ;
Schneider, B ;
Sterzel, J ;
Hillebrand, M ;
Benthien, S ;
Böhm, M .
JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, 2000, 266 :1188-1192
[7]   New method to determine the a-Si:H pin diode series resistance by noise measurements [J].
Blecher, F ;
Seibel, K ;
Hillebrand, M ;
Böhm, M .
AMORPHOUS AND MICROCRYSTALLINE SILICON TECHNOLOGY-1998, 1998, 507 :169-174
[8]   Photo- and dark current noise in a-Si:H pin diodes at forward and reverse bias [J].
Blecher, F ;
Seibel, K ;
Böhm, M .
AMORPHOUS AND MICROCRYSTALLINE SILICON TECHNOLOGY-1998, 1998, 507 :175-180
[9]  
BLECHER F, 1998, SIMULATION EXPT VERI
[10]  
BLECHER F, 1999, P MAT RES SOC S, V557