Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines

被引:24
作者
Fasnacht, Marc
Zhu, Jiang
Honig, Barry
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Ctr Computat Biol & Bioinformat, Dept Biochem & Mol Biophys, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Accelrys Inc, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
关键词
homology modeling; protein model; model evaluation; similarity measure; statistical potential; support vector machine; protein structure prediction;
D O I
10.1110/ps.072856307
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, we address the problem of local quality assessment in homology models. As a prerequisite for the evaluation of methods for predicting local model quality, we first examine the problem of measuring local structural similarities between a model and the corresponding native structure. Several local geometric similarity measures are evaluated. Two methods based on structural superposition are found to best reproduce local model quality assessments by human experts. We then examine the performance of state-of-the-art statistical potentials in predicting local model quality on three qualitatively distinct data sets. The best statistical potential, DFIRE, is shown to perform on par with the best current structure- based method in the literature, ProQres. A combination of different statistical potentials and structural features using support vector machines is shown to provide somewhat improved performance over published methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1557 / 1568
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]   Combining inference from evolution and geometric probability in protein structure evaluation [J].
Mihalek, I ;
Res, I ;
Yao, H ;
Lichtarge, O .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 331 (01) :263-279
[32]   Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) - Round 6 [J].
Moult, J ;
Fidelis, K ;
Rost, B ;
Hubbard, T ;
Tramontano, A .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 61 :3-7
[33]   Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V [J].
Moult, J ;
Fidelis, K ;
Zemla, A ;
Hubbard, T .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 :334-339
[34]   ENERGY PARAMETERS IN POLYPEPTIDES .10. IMPROVED GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS AND NONBONDED INTERACTIONS FOR USE IN THE ECEPP/3 ALGORITHM, WITH APPLICATION TO PROLINE-CONTAINING PEPTIDES [J].
NEMETHY, G ;
GIBSON, KD ;
PALMER, KA ;
YOON, CN ;
PATERLINI, G ;
ZAGARI, A ;
RUMSEY, S ;
SCHERAGA, HA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 96 (15) :6472-6484
[35]   Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds [J].
Park, BH ;
Huang, ES ;
Levitt, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 266 (04) :831-846
[36]   Protein structure prediction: Inroads to biology [J].
Petrey, D ;
Honig, B .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2005, 20 (06) :811-819
[37]   Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling [J].
Petrey, D ;
Xiang, ZX ;
Tang, CL ;
Xie, L ;
Gimpelev, M ;
Mitros, T ;
Soto, CS ;
Goldsmith-Fischman, S ;
Kernytsky, A ;
Schlessinger, A ;
Koh, IYY ;
Alexov, E ;
Honig, B .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 53 (06) :430-435
[38]   Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models [J].
Petrey, D ;
Honig, B .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2000, 9 (11) :2181-2191
[39]   Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment [J].
Pettitt, CS ;
McGuffin, LJ ;
Jones, DT .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (17) :3509-3515
[40]  
Rojnuckarin A, 1999, PROTEINS, V36, P54, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990701)36:1<54::AID-PROT5>3.3.CO