Use of high concentration contrast media (HCCM): principles and rationale - body CT

被引:52
作者
Brink, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
liver imaging; contrast media; computed tomography; hepatic enhancement;
D O I
10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00362-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Numerous complex pharmacokinetic interrelationships affect the use of contrast media for computed tomography (CT) imaging. The volume, concentration, and rate of injection, all affect the degree of enhancement that is achieved with an injection of contrast material. In addition, the injection technique, whether the contrast is infused with a constant injection rate (uniphasic injection) or whether the rate is altered during the injection (multiphasic injection) also affect the magnitude and duration of contrast enhancement. In body CT imaging, the liver poses unique challenges in managing the use of intravenous contrast material because of its dual blood supply and the need to complete imaging before equilibrium occurs between the intravascular and extravascular compartments. The magnitude of hepatic enhancement that is ultimately achieved is related primarily to the amount of iodinated contrast material that accumulates in the extravascular space within the target organ, independent of the speed of the CT scanner. The key determinant of the onset of the equilibrium phase is the injection duration. Given that a high injection flow rate (4-5 ml/s) is desirable for arterial phase imaging, the injection duration is maintained With use of an appropriate contrast volume. Thus, modifications of total iodine dose are best done with alterations in contrast concentration. The magnitude of arterial enhancement that is achieved is related to both the concentration and rate of contrast administration. The speed of the scanner determines its ability to record image data during the most advantageous time period, the peak of arterial enhancement. Thus, rapid imaging is particularly advantageous for optimal contrast use in CT angiography as well as in multiphasic imaging of the parenchymal organs. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S53 / S58
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model [J].
Bae, KT ;
Heiken, JP ;
Brink, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :657-662
[2]   Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part I. Prediction with a computer model [J].
Bae, KT ;
Heiken, JP ;
Brink, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :647-655
[3]   COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-MEDIA INJECTION RATES AND VOLUMES FOR HEPATIC DYNAMIC INCREMENTED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BERLAND, LL ;
LEE, JY .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (12) :918-922
[4]   HEPATIC SPIRAL CT - REDUCTION OF DOSE OF INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST MATERIAL [J].
BRINK, JA ;
HEIKEN, JP ;
FORMAN, HP ;
SAGEL, SS ;
MOLINA, PL ;
BROWN, PC .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (01) :83-88
[5]   CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN ABDOMINAL CT - BOLUS VS INFUSION [J].
BURGENER, FA ;
HAMLIN, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1981, 137 (02) :351-358
[6]   CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF HEPATIC-TUMORS IN CT - COMPARISON BETWEEN BOLUS AND INFUSION TECHNIQUES [J].
BURGENER, FA ;
HAMLIN, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 140 (02) :291-295
[7]   HEPATIC CT ENHANCEMENT .2. ALTERATIONS IN CONTRAST MATERIAL VOLUME AND RATE OF INJECTION WITHIN THE SAME PATIENTS [J].
CHAMBERS, TP ;
BARON, RL ;
LUSH, RM .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :518-522
[8]   HEPATIC CT ENHANCEMENT .1. ALTERATIONS IN THE VOLUME OF CONTRAST MATERIAL WITHIN THE SAME PATIENTS [J].
CHAMBERS, TP ;
BARON, RL ;
LUSH, RM .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :513-517
[9]   BOLUS GEOMETRY AND DYNAMICS AFTER INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-MEDIUM INJECTION [J].
CLAUSSEN, CD ;
BANZER, D ;
PFRETZSCHNER, C ;
KALENDER, WA ;
SCHORNER, W .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (02) :365-368
[10]   HEPATIC CT CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT - EFFECT OF DOSE, DURATION OF INFUSION, AND TIME ELAPSED FOLLOWING INFUSION [J].
DEAN, PB ;
VIOLANTE, MR ;
MAHONEY, JA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1980, 15 (02) :158-161