Quality management and organizational context in selected service industries of China

被引:102
作者
Zhao, XD [1 ]
Yeung, ACL
Lee, TS
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Decis Sci & Managerial Econ, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Logist, Hong Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
empirical taxonomy; quality management; organizational context; business results;
D O I
10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
By developing an empirical taxonomy of quality management systems (QMS) in selected service industries in China, we compare the taxonomy of QMS developed in the service industries to that found in previous studies in manufacturing industries. We further investigate contingency relationships between the development of a QMS and its organizational contexts. Based on cluster analyses of quality management practices measured by the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) criteria, we found four patterns of service quality management practices: undeveloped, accommodating, strategic, and soft quality systems. Our research indicates that the type of quality system adopted by an organization is highly associated with organizational contextual factors. Our results indicate that environmental uncertainty shapes the development of a QMS in the early stage, while the perceived importance of quality induces the further development of a QMS to a strategic quality system. The results also show that small service firms that compete locally can achieve very good performance results using a soft quality system, a QMS with no formal process management systems. This research provides empirical evidence on contingent relationships among quality management practices, organizational context, and business performance, thus contributing to contingency theory in quality management. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 587
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   ALTERNATIVE SCALES FOR MEASURING SERVICE QUALITY - A COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT BASED ON PSYCHOMETRIC AND DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA [J].
PARASURAMAN, A ;
ZEITHAML, VA ;
BERRY, LL .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1994, 70 (03) :201-230
[42]   SELF-REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH - PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS [J].
PODSAKOFF, PM ;
ORGAN, DW .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1986, 12 (04) :531-544
[43]   TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - A REVIEW AND EMPIRICAL-STUDY [J].
POWELL, TC .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1995, 16 (01) :15-37
[44]  
RAHMAN S, INT J PRODUCTION EC
[45]   Beyond process: TQM content and firm performance [J].
Reed, R ;
Lemak, DJ ;
Montgomery, JC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (01) :173-202
[46]   DEFINING QUALITY - ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
REEVES, CA ;
BEDNAR, DA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (03) :419-445
[47]  
Samson D, 1999, J OPER MANAG, V17, P393, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00046-1
[48]  
SHARMA S, 1996, MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQ
[49]   DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FORM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT - A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE [J].
SITKIN, SB ;
SUTCLIFFE, KM ;
SCHROEDER, RG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (03) :537-564
[50]  
Sousa R, 2001, PROD OPER MANAG, V10, P383