Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention

被引:40
作者
Reteig L.C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Talsma L.J. [1 ,2 ]
van Schouwenburg M.R. [1 ,2 ]
Slagter H.A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[2] Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[3] PO Box 15915, Amsterdam
关键词
Cognition; Cognitive enhancement; Neglect; Spatial attention; Sustained attention; transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS);
D O I
10.1007/s41465-017-0010-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attention is a fundamental cognitive process—without it, we would be helplessly adrift in an overload of sensory input. There is considerable interest in techniques that can be used to enhance attention, including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). We present an overview of 52 studies that have paired attention tasks with tES, mostly in the form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In particular, we discuss four aspects of attention that have been most extensively targeted to date: visual search, spatial orienting (e.g., Posner cueing tasks), spatial bias (e.g., line bisection tasks), and sustained attention. Some promising results have been reported in each of these domains. However, drawing general conclusions about the efficacy of tES is at present hampered by a large diversity in study design and inconsistent findings. We highlight some pitfalls and opportunities and suggest how these may be addressed in future research aiming to use tES as a tool to enhance or test theoretical hypotheses about attention. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 25
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[31]  
de Berker A.O., Bikson M., Bestmann S., Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, October, (2013)
[32]  
de Tommaso M., Invitto S., Ricci K., Lucchese V., Delussi M., Quattromini P., Et al., Effects of anodal TDCS stimulation of left parietal cortex on visual spatial attention tasks in men and women across menstrual cycle, Neuroscience Letters, 574, pp. 21-25, (2014)
[33]  
Dyke K., Kim S., Jackson G.M., Jackson S.R., Intra-subject consistency and reliability of response following 2 mA transcranial direct current stimulation, Brain Stimulation, pp. 1-7, (2016)
[34]  
Ellison A., Ball K.L., Moseley P., Dowsett J., Smith D.T., Weis S., Et al., Functional interaction between right parietal and bilateral frontal cortices during visual search tasks revealed using functional magnetic imaging and transcranial direct current stimulation, PLOS ONE, 9, 4, (2014)
[35]  
Falcone B., Coffman B.A., Clark V.P., Parasuraman R., Transcranial direct current stimulation augments perceptual sensitivity and 24-hour retention in a complex threat detection task, PLOS ONE, 7, 4, (2012)
[36]  
Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Sommer T., Raz A., Posner M.I., Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 3, pp. 340-347, (2002)
[37]  
Filmer H.L., Dux P.E., Mattingley J.B., Dissociable effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS reveal distinct functional roles for right parietal cortex in the detection of single and competing stimuli, Neuropsychologia, 74, pp. 120-126, (2015)
[38]  
Giglia G., Mattaliano P., Puma A., Rizzo S., Fierro B., Brighina F., Neglect-like effects induced by tDCS modulation of posterior parietal cortices in healthy subjects, Brain Stimulation, 4, 4, pp. 294-299, (2011)
[39]  
Green C.S., Bavelier D., Learning, attentional control, and action video games, Current Biology, 22, 6, pp. R197-R206, (2012)
[40]  
Heilman K.M., Watson R., Valenstein E., Neglect and related disorders, Clinical neurophysiology, pp. 296-348, (2012)