Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention

被引:40
作者
Reteig L.C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Talsma L.J. [1 ,2 ]
van Schouwenburg M.R. [1 ,2 ]
Slagter H.A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[2] Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[3] PO Box 15915, Amsterdam
关键词
Cognition; Cognitive enhancement; Neglect; Spatial attention; Sustained attention; transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS);
D O I
10.1007/s41465-017-0010-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attention is a fundamental cognitive process—without it, we would be helplessly adrift in an overload of sensory input. There is considerable interest in techniques that can be used to enhance attention, including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). We present an overview of 52 studies that have paired attention tasks with tES, mostly in the form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In particular, we discuss four aspects of attention that have been most extensively targeted to date: visual search, spatial orienting (e.g., Posner cueing tasks), spatial bias (e.g., line bisection tasks), and sustained attention. Some promising results have been reported in each of these domains. However, drawing general conclusions about the efficacy of tES is at present hampered by a large diversity in study design and inconsistent findings. We highlight some pitfalls and opportunities and suggest how these may be addressed in future research aiming to use tES as a tool to enhance or test theoretical hypotheses about attention. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 25
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[91]  
Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L., Attentional modulation of visual processing, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, pp. 611-647, (2004)
[92]  
Roe J.M., Nesheim M., Mathiesen N.C., Moberget T., Alnaes D., Sneve M.H., The effects of tDCS upon sustained visual attention are dependent on cognitive load, Neuropsychologia, 80, pp. 1-8, (2016)
[93]  
Roy L.B., Sparing R., Fink G.R., Hesse M.D., Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC, Neuropsychologia, 74, pp. 96-107, (2015)
[94]  
Sarkar A., Dowker A., Cohen Kadosh R., Cognitive enhancement or cognitive cost: trait-specific outcomes of brain stimulation in the case of mathematics anxiety, Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 50, pp. 16605-16610, (2014)
[95]  
Siegel M., Donner T., Linking band-limited cortical activity to fMRI and behavior. In Simultaneous eeg and fMRI., pp. 1-23, (2010)
[96]  
Smit M., Schutter D.J.L.G., Nijboer T.C.W., Visser-Meily J.M.A., Kappelle L.J., Kant N., Et al., Transcranial direct current stimulation to the parietal cortex in hemispatial neglect: a feasibility study, Neuropsychologia, 74, pp. 152-161, (2015)
[97]  
Snowball A., Tachtsidis I., Popescu T., Thompson J., Delazer M., Zamarian L., Et al., Long-term enhancement of brain function and cognition using cognitive training and brain stimulation, Current Biology, 23, 11, pp. 987-992, (2013)
[98]  
Sparing R., Thimm M., Hesse M.D., Kust J., Karbe H., Fink G.R., Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation, Brain, 132, pp. 3011-3020, (2009)
[99]  
Stagg C.J., Nitsche M.A., Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation, The Neuroscientist, 17, 1, pp. 37-53, (2011)
[100]  
Stagg C.J., Best J.G., Stephenson M.C., O'Shea J., Wylezinska M., Kincses Z.T., Et al., Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation, Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 16, pp. 5202-5206, (2009)