Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention

被引:40
作者
Reteig L.C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Talsma L.J. [1 ,2 ]
van Schouwenburg M.R. [1 ,2 ]
Slagter H.A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[2] Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[3] PO Box 15915, Amsterdam
关键词
Cognition; Cognitive enhancement; Neglect; Spatial attention; Sustained attention; transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS);
D O I
10.1007/s41465-017-0010-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attention is a fundamental cognitive process—without it, we would be helplessly adrift in an overload of sensory input. There is considerable interest in techniques that can be used to enhance attention, including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). We present an overview of 52 studies that have paired attention tasks with tES, mostly in the form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In particular, we discuss four aspects of attention that have been most extensively targeted to date: visual search, spatial orienting (e.g., Posner cueing tasks), spatial bias (e.g., line bisection tasks), and sustained attention. Some promising results have been reported in each of these domains. However, drawing general conclusions about the efficacy of tES is at present hampered by a large diversity in study design and inconsistent findings. We highlight some pitfalls and opportunities and suggest how these may be addressed in future research aiming to use tES as a tool to enhance or test theoretical hypotheses about attention. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 25
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[101]  
Stone D.B., Tesche C.D., Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention, Neuroreport, 20, 12, pp. 1115-1119, (2009)
[102]  
Strube W., Bunse T., Nitsche M.A., Nikolaeva A., Palm U., Padberg F., Et al., Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants, Physiological Reports, 4, 15, (2016)
[103]  
Sunwoo H., Kim Y.H., Chang W.H., Noh S., Kim E.J., Ko M.-H., Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke unilateral visuospatial neglect, Neuroscience Letters, 554, pp. 94-98, (2013)
[104]  
Terney D., Chaieb L., Moliadze V., Antal A., Paulus W., Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation, Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 52, pp. 14147-14155, (2008)
[105]  
Terzuolo C., Bullock T., Measurement of imposed voltage gradient adequate to modulate neuronal firing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 42, pp. 687-694, (1956)
[106]  
Turgut N., Miranda M., Kastrup A., Eling P., Hildebrandt H., TDCS combined with optokinetic drift reduces egocentric neglect in severely impaired post-acute patients, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, (2016)
[107]  
Vallar G., Perani D., The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man, Neuropsychologia, 24, 5, pp. 609-622, (1986)
[108]  
van Driel J., Sligte I.G., Linders J., Elport D., Cohen M.X., Frequency band-specific electrical brain stimulation modulates cognitive control processes, PLOS ONE, 10, 9, (2015)
[109]  
Weiss M., Lavidor M., When less is more: evidence for a facilitative cathodal tDCS effect in attentional abilities, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 9, pp. 1826-1833, (2012)
[110]  
Wiethoff S., Hamada M., Rothwell J.C., Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex, Brain stimulation, 7, 3, pp. 468-475, (2014)