Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention

被引:40
作者
Reteig L.C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Talsma L.J. [1 ,2 ]
van Schouwenburg M.R. [1 ,2 ]
Slagter H.A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[2] Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam
[3] PO Box 15915, Amsterdam
关键词
Cognition; Cognitive enhancement; Neglect; Spatial attention; Sustained attention; transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS);
D O I
10.1007/s41465-017-0010-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attention is a fundamental cognitive process—without it, we would be helplessly adrift in an overload of sensory input. There is considerable interest in techniques that can be used to enhance attention, including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). We present an overview of 52 studies that have paired attention tasks with tES, mostly in the form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In particular, we discuss four aspects of attention that have been most extensively targeted to date: visual search, spatial orienting (e.g., Posner cueing tasks), spatial bias (e.g., line bisection tasks), and sustained attention. Some promising results have been reported in each of these domains. However, drawing general conclusions about the efficacy of tES is at present hampered by a large diversity in study design and inconsistent findings. We highlight some pitfalls and opportunities and suggest how these may be addressed in future research aiming to use tES as a tool to enhance or test theoretical hypotheses about attention. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 25
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[41]  
Herrmann C.S., Rach S., Neuling T., Struber D., Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, June, (2013)
[42]  
Hone-Blanchet A., Edden R.A., Fecteau S., Online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in real time on human prefrontal and striatal metabolites, Biological Psychiatry, 80, 6, pp. 432-438, (2016)
[43]  
Hopfinger J.B., Parsons J., Frohlich F., Differential effects of 10-Hz and 40-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on endogenous versus exogenous attention, Cognitive Neuroscience, 8928, June, pp. 1-10, (2016)
[44]  
Horvath J.C., Forte J.D., Carter O., Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Brain Stimulation, 8, 3, pp. 535-550, (2015)
[45]  
Horvath J.C., Vogrin S.J., Carter O., Cook M.J., Forte J.D., Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potential amplitude are neither reliable nor significant within individuals over 9 separate testing sessions, Brain Stimulation, 8, 2, (2015)
[46]  
Hsu W.-Y., Zanto T.P., Anguera J.A., Lin Y.-Y., Gazzaley A., Delayed enhancement of multitasking performance: effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the prefrontal cortex, Cortex, 69, pp. 175-185, (2015)
[47]  
Iuculano T., Cohen Kadosh R., The mental cost of cognitive enhancement, Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 10, pp. 4482-4486, (2013)
[48]  
Jacobson L., Koslowsky M., Lavidor M., tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review, Experimental Brain Research, 216, 1, pp. 1-10, (2012)
[49]  
Jewell G., McCourt M.E., Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks, Neuropsychologia, 38, 1, pp. 93-110, (2000)
[50]  
Jones K.T., Berryhill M.E., Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 3, pp. 1-11, (2012)