BLOOD-GLUCOSE AREA UNDER THE CURVE - METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS

被引:244
作者
LEFLOCH, JP [1 ]
ESCUYER, P [1 ]
BAUDIN, E [1 ]
BAUDON, D [1 ]
PERLEMUTER, L [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU HENRI MONDOR,DEPT MED INFORMAT,F-94010 CRETEIL,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.13.2.172
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To specify the influence of methods used in estimating area under the curve (AUC) and the meaning of total and incremental AUC, 75 glycemic responses to a mixed meal were studied in 75 diabetic patients, 39 with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and 36 with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. AUC was integrated with five computerized methods: polynomial interpolation of third and fourth degree, trapezoidal rule, Simpson's integration, and cubic interpolatory splines. Although these methods gave significantly different results (P <0.001), a strong correlation was found between estimations of AUC with different methods (r >0.99, P <0.001). In addition, variation between methods was ≤2%, whereas the coefficient of variation between subjects was 38%. Total AUC was strongly correlated with basal blood glucose value (r = 0.90, P <0.001), whereas incremental and positive AUC were not (r = 0.12 and 0.07, respectively, NS). Incremental and positive AUC were strongly correlated with glycemic rise (r = 0.89 and 0.93, respectively, P <0.001), whereas total AUC was only slightly so (r = 0.31, P <0.01). Incremental and positive AUC gave slightly but significantly different information on glucose response. These results suggest that variations related to the method used in estimating AUC are not clinically relevant and that a simple method such as trapezoidal rule can be used. Total AUC is a descriptive factor related to basal blood glucose value, whereas incremental and positive AUC more accurately describe glycemic response to foods.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 175
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Fru┬berg C.-E., 1969, INTRO NUMERICAL ANAL
[2]   FACTORS AFFECTING INTERPRETATION OF POSTPRANDIAL GLUCOSE AND INSULIN AREAS [J].
GANNON, MC ;
NUTTALL, FQ .
DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (06) :759-763
[3]  
Hamming RW., 1973, NUMERICAL METHODS SC
[4]   COMPARISON OF PLASMA-GLUCOSE AND INSULIN RESPONSES TO MIXED MEALS OF HIGH-GLYCEMIC, INTERMEDIATE-GLYCEMIC, AND LOW-GLYCEMIC POTENTIAL [J].
HOLLENBECK, CB ;
COULSTON, AM ;
REAVEN, GM .
DIABETES CARE, 1988, 11 (04) :323-329
[5]   GLYCEMIC INDEX OF FOODS - A PHYSIOLOGICAL-BASIS FOR CARBOHYDRATE EXCHANGE [J].
JENKINS, DJA ;
WOLEVER, TMS ;
TAYLOR, RH ;
BARKER, H ;
FIELDEN, H ;
BALDWIN, JM ;
BOWLING, AC ;
NEWMAN, HC ;
JENKINS, AL ;
GOFF, DV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1981, 34 (03) :362-366
[6]   COMPARISON OF PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF DIABETIC EXCHANGE LISTS AND GLYCEMIC INDEX OF FOODS [J].
LAINE, DC ;
THOMAS, W ;
LEVITT, MD ;
BANTLE, JP .
DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (04) :387-394
[7]  
Lawson C. J., 1974, SOLVING LEAST SQUARE
[8]   ABSORPTION CHARACTERISTIC OF BREAKFAST DETERMINES INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND CARBOHYDRATE-TOLERANCE FOR LUNCH [J].
NESTLER, JE ;
BARLASCINI, CO ;
CLORE, JN ;
BLACKARD, WG .
DIABETES CARE, 1988, 11 (10) :755-760
[9]   EFFECT OF PROTEIN INGESTION ON THE GLUCOSE AND INSULIN-RESPONSE TO A STANDARDIZED ORAL GLUCOSE-LOAD [J].
NUTTALL, FQ ;
MOORADIAN, AD ;
GANNON, MC ;
BILLINGTON, C ;
KREZOWSKI, P .
DIABETES CARE, 1984, 7 (05) :465-470
[10]   HIGH-FIBER FOODS AT BREAKFAST - INFLUENCE ON PLASMA-GLUCOSE AND INSULIN RESPONSES TO LUNCH [J].
SHAHEEN, SM ;
FLEMING, SE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1987, 46 (05) :804-811