PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING DECISION - THE EFFECTS OF SITUATIONAL INVOLVEMENT AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON INFORMATION ACQUISITION AND DECISION-MAKING

被引:51
作者
CHINBURAPA, V
LARSON, LN
BRUCKS, M
DRAUGALIS, J
BOOTMAN, JL
PUTO, CP
机构
[1] DRAKE UNIV, COLL PHARM, DES MOINES, IA 50311 USA
[2] UNIV ARIZONA, TUCSON, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
PHYSICIAN DRUG PRESCRIBING; DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; PROCESS TRACING; CONJOINT ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/0277-9536(93)90389-L
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This research utilized conjoint analysis and an analysis of information acquisition to examine the effects of situational involvement and task complexity on physician's decision-making process. The predictive accuracy of the linear model in predicting drug choice across situations was also assessed. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies was used as a framework in the study. A sample of forty-eight physicians was asked to indicate their preferences and choices for hypothetical anti-infective drugs. Situational involvement was manipulated by telling physicians in the experimental group via the written scenario to assume that his/her decision would be reviewed and evaluated by peers and (s)he would be asked to justify drug choice. Task complexity was manipulated by varying the number of drug alternatives in a choice set. Results of the study indicated that physicians shifted from using compensatory to noncompensatory decision-making processes when task complexity increased. The effect of situational involvement on the decision-making process was not supported. However, physicians in the two groups were found to differ in choice outcomes and the attention given to specific drug attribute information. Finally, the linear model was found to be robust in predicting drug choice across contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1473 / 1482
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]  
Kunin CM., 1987, DETECTION PREVENTION, V4th
[32]   HOW PHYSICIANS CHOOSE THEIR DRUGS [J].
LILJA, J .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1976, 10 (7-8) :363-365
[33]   A MODEL FOR PHYSICIANS THERAPEUTIC DECISION-MAKING [J].
MANCUSO, CA ;
ROSE, DN .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 147 (07) :1281-1285
[34]   CONTINGENCY-MODEL FOR THE SELECTION OF DECISION STRATEGIES - EMPIRICAL-TEST OF THE EFFECTS OF SIGNIFICANCE, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND REVERSIBILITY [J].
MCALLISTER, DW ;
MITCHELL, TR ;
BEACH, LR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1979, 24 (02) :228-244
[35]   DECISION RULES AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING STRATEGIES FOR CHOICES AMONG MULTIATTRIBUTE ALTERNATIVES [J].
MONTGOMERY, H ;
SVENSON, O .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 17 (04) :283-291
[36]   DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY, RISKS, AND TRADEOFFS IN CLINICAL DECISIONS - A COGNITIVE SCIENCE APPROACH [J].
MOSKOWITZ, AJ ;
KUIPERS, BJ ;
KASSIRER, JP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 108 (03) :435-449
[37]  
Newell A., 1972, HUMAN PROBLEM SOLVIN, V104
[38]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF SIMPLIFICATION STRATEGIES IN A COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING TASK [J].
ONKEN, J ;
HASTIE, R ;
REVELLE, W .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1985, 11 (01) :14-27
[39]   EFFECT OF INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATION-RELATED FACTORS ON CONSUMER SELECTION OF JUDGMENTAL MODELS [J].
PARK, CW .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1976, 13 (02) :144-151
[40]   TASK COMPLEXITY AND CONTINGENT PROCESSING IN DECISION-MAKING - INFORMATION SEARCH AND PROTOCOL ANALYSIS [J].
PAYNE, JW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1976, 16 (02) :366-387