TOXICITY AND IMMEDIATE ALLERGENICITY OF LATEX GLOVES

被引:30
作者
CORMIO, L
TURJANMAA, K
TALJA, M
ANDERSSON, LC
RUUTU, M
机构
[1] TAMPERE UNIV HOSP,DEPT DERMATOL,TAMPERE,FINLAND
[2] KUOPIO UNIV HOSP,DEPT SURG,UROL UNIT,KUOPIO,FINLAND
[3] UNIV HELSINKI,INST PATHOL,SF-00100 HELSINKI 10,FINLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00903.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Surgical latex gloves and a natural rubber latex (NRL) catheter were evaluated for biocompatibility by cell culture methods and Type I allergic reactions in operating room personnel using latex gloves. The prevalence of relevant immediate allergy to NRL was 5.2 % when using eluates made from different latex gloves as allergens and the skin-prick test methodology. The reliability of a questionnaire in detecting the sensitized persons was limited. Weak positive skin test reactions to surgical latex glove eluates were found to be unreliable as compared with challenging with the corresponding glove. Latex gloves exhibited more toxicity in cell culture than non latex gloves but, inversely, the toxic catheter gave weak positive skin-prick test reaction in only one sensitized person, confirming that the allergenicity and toxicity of natural rubber products do not refer to the same properties of the products. Catheters exhibiting toxicity in cell culture have earlier been found to cause significant clinical symptoms in operated patients, but in the case of surgical gloves this relationship is not clear. One glove brand with a low content of known sensitizing rubber chemicals caused clear toxicity in cell culture but was well tolerated by the hospital personnel.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 623
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
FISHER AA, 1986, CONTACT DERMATITIS, P619
[12]   CONTACT URTICARIA TO RUBBER GLOVES IS IGE-MEDIATED [J].
FROSCH, PJ ;
WAHL, R ;
BAHMER, FA ;
MAASCH, HJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (04) :241-245
[13]  
GELFAND DW, 1991, AM J ROENTGENOL, V156, P1
[14]   ALLERGIC AND IRRITANT REACTIONS TO RUBBER GLOVES IN MEDICAL HEALTH-SERVICES - SPECTRUM, DIAGNOSTIC-APPROACH, AND THERAPY [J].
HEESE, A ;
VONHINTZENSTERN, J ;
PETERS, KP ;
KOCH, HU ;
HORNSTEIN, OP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 25 (05) :831-839
[15]   COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT CELL-CULTURE METHODS IN EVALUATION OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF LATEX URINARY CATHETERS [J].
KORHONEN, P ;
TALJA, M ;
RUUTU, M ;
ANDERSSON, LC ;
ALFTHAN, O .
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 19 (02) :127-130
[16]  
LAGIER F, 1992, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, V3, P19
[17]   PRICK AND USE TESTS WITH 6 GLOVE BRANDS IN PATIENTS WITH IMMEDIATE ALLERGY TO RUBBER PROTEINS [J].
LAHTI, A ;
TURJANMAA, K .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1992, 26 (04) :259-262
[18]   ALLERGY TO LATEX [J].
LEVY, DA ;
CHARPIN, D ;
PECQUET, C ;
LEYNADIER, F ;
VERVLOET, D .
ALLERGY, 1992, 47 (06) :579-587
[19]   CHARACTERIZATION OF LATEX ANTIGENS AND ALLERGENS IN SURGICAL GLOVES AND NATURAL-RUBBER BY IMMUNOELECTROPHORETIC METHODS [J].
MAKINENKILJUNEN, S ;
TURJANMAA, K ;
PALOSUO, T ;
REUNALA, T .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 90 (02) :230-235
[20]   INTRAOPERATIVE ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION DUE TO LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY [J].
MERGUERIAN, PA ;
KLEIN, RB ;
GRAVEN, MA ;
ROZYCKI, AA .
UROLOGY, 1991, 38 (04) :301-304