Processing biological gender and number information during Chinese pronoun resolution: ERP evidence for functional differentiation

被引:30
作者
Xu, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Xiaoming [4 ,5 ]
Zhou, Xiaolin [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Res Ctr Learning Sci, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Key Lab Child Dev & Learning Sci, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Foreign Languages & Cultures, Nanjing 210097, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Ctr Brain & Cognit Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Psychol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Key Lab Machine Percept, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ, Key Lab Computat Linguist, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
Pronoun resolution; Gender agreement; Number agreement; Chinese; ERP; P600; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; WORKING-MEMORY; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; SEMANTIC INTEGRATION; SYNTACTIC HIERARCHY; GRAMMATICAL GENDER; AGREEMENT; MECHANISMS; VIOLATION; INTERPLAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
There have been a number of behavioral and neural studies on the processing of syntactic gender and number agreement information, marked by different morpho-syntactic features during sentence comprehension. By using the event-related potential (ERP) technique, the present study investigated whether the processing of semantic gender information and the processing of notional number information can be differentiated and to what extent they might interact during Chinese pronoun resolution. The pronoun (with singular form in Experiment 1 and with plural form in Experiment 2) in a sentence matched its antecedent or mismatched it with respect to either biological gender or notional number or both. While the number mismatch elicited a P600 effect starting from 550 ms (for singular pronoun) or 400 ms (for plural pronoun) post-onset of the pronoun, the gender mismatch elicited an earlier (for singular) and larger (for both singular and plural) P600 effect. More importantly, the double mismatch produced a P600 effect identical to the effect elicited by the single gender mismatch. These results demonstrate that biological gender information and notional number information are processed differentially and have different processing priorities during Chinese pronoun resolution. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 236
页数:14
相关论文
共 86 条
[51]  
Langacker R. W., 1993, Cognitive Linguistics, V4, P1, DOI 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
[52]   Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension [J].
Li, Xiaoqian ;
Zhou, Xiaolin .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1331 :96-104
[53]  
Li Y. H. A., 2000, MODERN LINGUISTICS, V1, P61
[54]   Plurality in a classifier language (Mandarin Chinese, plural analysis) [J].
Li, YHA .
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN LINGUISTICS, 1999, 8 (01) :75-99
[55]   A person is not a number: Discourse involvement in subject-verb agreement computation [J].
Mancini, Simona ;
Molinaro, Nicola ;
Rizzi, Luigi ;
Carreiras, Manuel .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 1410 :64-76
[56]   NEW DIRECTIONS FOR INVESTIGATING CHILDRENS GENDER KNOWLEDGE [J].
MARTIN, CL .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1993, 13 (02) :184-204
[57]   Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing:: A brain potential study of noun-ajective agreement in Spanish [J].
Martin-Loeches, Manuel ;
Nigbur, Roland ;
Casado, Pilar ;
Hohlfeld, Annette ;
Sommer, Werner .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1093 :178-189
[58]   Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation [J].
Molinaro, Nicola ;
Kim, Albert ;
Vespignani, Francesco ;
Job, Remo .
COGNITION, 2008, 106 (02) :963-974
[59]   Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions [J].
Molinaro, Nicola ;
Barber, Horacio A. ;
Carreiras, Manuel .
CORTEX, 2011, 47 (08) :908-930
[60]   Why brother and sister are not just siblings: Repair processes in agreement computation [J].
Molinaro, Nicola ;
Vespignani, Francesco ;
Zamparelli, Roberto ;
Job, Remo .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2011, 64 (03) :211-232