Preliminary validation of a new methodology for estimating dose reduction protocols in neonatal chest computed radiographs

被引:1
作者
Don, Steven [1 ]
Whiting, Bruce R. [1 ]
Hildebolt, Charles F. [1 ]
Sehnert, W. James [1 ]
Ellinwood, Jacquelyn S. [1 ]
Töpfer, Karin [1 ]
Masoumzadeh, Parinaz [1 ]
Krausa, Richard A. [1 ]
Kronemer, Keith A. [1 ]
Herman, Thomas [1 ]
McAlister, William H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3 | 2006年 / 6142卷
关键词
x-ray dose reduction; noise simulation; computed radiography; chest radiography; neonate;
D O I
10.1117/12.654486
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The risk of radiation exposure is greatest for pediatric patients and, thus, there is a great incentive to reduce the radiation dose used in diagnostic procedures for children to "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA). Testing of low-dose protocols presents a dilemma, as it is unethical to repeatedly expose patients to ionizing radiation in order to determine optimum protocols. To overcome this problem, we have developed a computed-radiography (CR) dose-reduction simulation tool that takes existing images and adds synthetic noise to create realistic images that correspond to images generated with lower doses. The objective of our study was to determine the extent to which simulated, low-dose images corresponded with original (non-simulated) low-dose images. To make this determination, we created pneumothoraces of known volumes in five neonate cadavers and obtained images of the neonates at 10 mR, 1 mR and 0.1 mR (as measured at the cassette plate). The 10-mR exposures were considered "relatively-noise-free" images. We used these 10 mR-images and our simulation tool to create simulated 0.1- and 1-mR images. For the simulated and original images, we identified regions of interest (ROI) of the entire chest, free-in-air region, and liver. We compared the means and standard deviations of the ROI grey-scale values of the simulated and original images with paired t tests. We also had observers rate simulated and original images for image quality and for the presence or absence of pneumothoraces. There was no statistically significant difference in grey-scale-value means nor standard deviations between simulated and original entire chest ROI regions. The observer performance suggests that an exposure >= 0.2 mR is required to detect the presence or absence of pneumothoraces. These preliminary results indicate that the use of the simulation tool is promising for achieving ALARA exposures in children.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[2]   Computed radiography versus screen-film radiography: Detection of pulmonary edema in a rabbit model that simulates neonatal pulmonary infiltrates [J].
Don, S ;
Hildebolt, CF ;
Sharp, TL ;
Shackelford, GD ;
Lau, DM ;
Herman, TE ;
McAlister, WH .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) :455-460
[3]   Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital [J].
Donnelly, LF ;
Emery, KH ;
Brody, AS ;
Laor, T ;
Gylys-Morin, VM ;
Anton, CG ;
Thomas, SR ;
Frush, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :303-306
[4]   Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients [J].
Frush, DP ;
Slack, CC ;
Hollingsworth, CL ;
Bisset, GS ;
Donnelly, LF ;
Hsieh, J ;
Lavin-Wensell, T ;
Mayo, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) :1107-1113
[5]   Relative impact of detector noise and anatomical structure on lung nodule detection [J].
Keelan, BW ;
Töpfer, K ;
Yorkston, J ;
Sehnert, WJ ;
Ellinwood, JS .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 5372 :230-241
[6]  
*NCRP, 1971, NCRP BAS RAD PROT CR
[7]   Helical CT of the body: Are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? [J].
Paterson, A ;
Frush, DP ;
Donnelly, LF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :297-301
[8]   Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12 .1. Cancer: 1950-1990 [J].
Pierce, DA ;
Shimizu, Y ;
Preston, DL ;
Vaeth, M ;
Mabuchi, K .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1996, 146 (01) :1-27
[9]  
Pierce DA, 2000, RADIAT RES, V154, P178, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0178:RRCRAL]2.0.CO
[10]  
2