Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view

被引:103
作者
Hirsch, E. [1 ]
Wolf, U. [2 ]
Heinicke, F. [2 ]
Silva, M. A. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Sch Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Ctr Radiotherapy & Radio Oncol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
thermo luminescent dosimetry; tomography; X-ray computed; radiography; panoramic; cone beam computed tomography;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr/23424132
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study compares tissue-absorbed and effective doses of the cone beam CT (CBCT) units, the Veraviewepocs 3D and the 3D Accuitomo, in different protocols. Methods: The absorbed organ doses were measured using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) in 16 sensitive organ sites. Both CBCT units were deployed with different fields of view (FOVs): 3D Accuitomo using two protocols (anterior 4 x 4 cm scan and anterior 6 x 6 cm scan) and Veraviewepocs 3D using three protocols (anterior 4 x 4 cm scan, anterior 8 x 4 cm scan and panoramic + anterior 4 x 4 cm). Equivalent and effective doses were then calculated, the latter based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection's (ICRP) 2005 recommendations. Results: The lowest effective dose was observed for the 3D Accuitomo 4 x 4 cm (20.02 mu Sv), the highest for the 3D Accuitomo 6 x 6 cm (43.27 mu Sv). The effective dose recorded for Veraviewepocs 3D was 39.92 mu Sv for the 8 x 4 cm scan, 30.92 mu Sv for the 4 x 4 cm scan and 29.78 mu Sv for the panoramic + 4 x 4 cm scan protocol. Conclusions: The radiation doses delivered by both machines were in comparable ranges when using 4 x 4 cm FOV. A smaller FOV should be used for dental images, whereas a larger FOV should be restricted to cases in which a wider view is required.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 273
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use [J].
Arai, Y ;
Tammisalo, E ;
Iwai, K ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Shinoda, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (04) :245-248
[2]  
Aranyarachkul P, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P416
[3]   Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients [J].
Cevidanes, LHS ;
Bailey, LJ ;
Tucker, GR ;
Styner, MA ;
Mol, A ;
Phillips, CL ;
Proffit, WR ;
Turvey, T .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (06) :369-375
[4]  
CLARK D E, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P156
[5]   Radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Kemper, J ;
Möbes, O ;
Pawelzik, J ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :634-637
[6]   Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine [J].
Danforth, RA ;
Clark, DE .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 89 (02) :236-243
[7]   Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: The Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit [J].
Dula, K ;
Mini, R ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Sanderink, GCH ;
Schneeberger, P ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 91 (06) :735-742
[8]   Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible [J].
Dula, K ;
Mini, R ;
vanderStelt, PF ;
Lambrecht, JT ;
Schneeberger, P ;
Buser, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1996, 104 (5-6) :503-510
[9]   Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Farman, Allan G. ;
Scarfe, William C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (02) :257-265
[10]   EFFECTIVE DOSE AND RISK ASSESSMENT FROM FILM TOMOGRAPHY USED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT DIAGNOSTICS [J].
FREDERIKSEN, NL ;
BENSON, BW ;
SOKOLOWSKI, TW .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (03) :123-127