Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water

被引:113
作者
Fogliata, A [1 ]
Nicolini, G
Vanetti, E
Clivio, A
Cozzi, L
机构
[1] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[2] Univ Milan, Med Phys Specialisat Sch, Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/004
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In July 2005 a new algorithm was released by Varian Medical Systems for the Eclipse planning system and installed in our institute. It is the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) for photon dose calculations, a convolution/superposition model for the first time implemented in a Varian planning system. It was therefore necessary to perform validation studies at different levels with a wide investigation approach. To validate the basic performances of the AAA, a detailed analysis of data computed by the AAA configuration algorithm was carried out and data were compared against measurements. To better appraise the performance of AAA and the capability of its configuration to tailor machine-specific characteristics, data obtained from the pencil beam convolution (PBC) algorithm implemented in Eclipse were also added in the comparison. Since the purpose of the paper is to address the basic performances of the AAA and of its configuration procedures, only data relative to measurements in water will be reported. Validation was carried out for three beams: 6 MV and 15 MV from a Clinac 2100C/D and 6 MV from a Clinac 6EX. Generally AAA calculations reproduced very well measured data, and small deviations were observed, on average, for all the quantities investigated for open and wedged fields. In particular, percentage depth-dose curves showed on average differences between calculation and measurement smaller than 1% or 1 mm, and computed profiles in the flattened region matched measurements with deviations smaller than 1% for all beams, field sizes, depths and wedges. Percentage differences in output factors were observed as small as 1% on average (with a range smaller than +/- 2%) for all conditions. Additional tests were carried out for enhanced dynamic wedges with results comparable to previous results. The basic dosimetric validation of the AAA was therefore considered satisfactory.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1438
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AAPM TASK GROUP, 1995, 55 AAPM
[2]   Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package [J].
Borca, VC ;
Pasquino, M ;
Bresciani, S ;
Catuzzo, P ;
Ozzello, F ;
Tofani, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (03) :744-751
[3]  
BRAME A, 1984, ACTA RAD ONCOL, V23, P379
[4]   Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations [J].
Cozzi, L ;
Buffa, FM ;
Fogliata, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) :193-200
[5]   Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3-D treatment planning system using Report 55 by AAPM Task Group 23 [J].
Declich, F ;
Fumasoni, K ;
Mangili, P ;
Cattaneo, GM ;
Iori, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 52 (01) :69-77
[6]   American Association of Physicists in Medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Fraass, B ;
Doppke, K ;
Hunt, M ;
Kutcher, G ;
Starkschall, G ;
Stern, R ;
Van Dyke, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1773-1829
[7]   Validation of treatment planning system data: variation in the modelling of three 6 MV beams for extreme rectangular fields [J].
Kermode, RH ;
Little, BG ;
Richmond, ND ;
Lawrence, GP ;
Lambert, GD .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (03) :329-332
[8]   THE DOSIMETRIC VERIFICATION OF A PENCIL BEAM BASED TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM [J].
KNOOS, T ;
CEBERG, C ;
WEBER, L ;
NILSSON, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1609-1628
[9]   A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions [J].
Low, DA ;
Harms, WB ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :656-661
[10]  
MIJNHEER BA, 2004, 7 ESTRO