Tolerability and patient acceptance of sodium phosphate tablets compared with 4-L PEG solution in colon cleansing -: Combined results of 2 identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase 3 trials

被引:35
作者
Kastenberg, David
Barish, Charles
Burack, Harry
Dalke, Douglas Dean
Duckor, Steven
Putnam, William
Valenzuela, Gregg
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Wake Res Associates, Raleigh, NC USA
[3] Digest Disorders Ctr, St Peters, MO USA
[4] Gastroenterol Specialists PC, Lincoln, NE USA
[5] Associated Gastroenterol Med Grp, Orange, CA USA
[6] Seattle Gastroenterol Associates, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Med Specialties Inc, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
colonoscopy; purgative; sodium phosphate tablet; tolerability; visicol;
D O I
10.1097/01.mcg.0000212662.66644.76
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: Evaluate patient tolerance and acceptance of a sodium phosphate (NaP) tablet purgative compared with a 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. Background: Characteristics and side effects of bowel purgatives deter patients from undergoing screening colonoscopy. Published data demonstrated comparable bowel cleansing with NaP tablets and a 4-L PEG solution in 2 phase for 3 studies. This report presents data on patient tolerability and acceptance. Study: Two identically designed, randomized, investigator-blinded, and multicenter trials were performed. Tolerability and patient acceptance were based on purgative regimen compliance, incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, and patient responses to questionnaires. Results: Eight hundred forty-five patients were assessed (420 and 425 in the tablet and PEG solution groups, respectively). Patient compliance with the tablet regimen was greater: 94% of patients took all the tablets compared with 57% completing the PEG solution regimen (P < 0.0001). Nausea, vomiting, and bloating occurred significantly less often in patients taking NaP tablets (P < 0.0001). Among patients taking tablets, 88.4% rated them "easy" or "slightly difficult" to take, compared with 60.6% of patients taking the PEG solution. The preparation's taste was rated "barely tolerable" or "not tolerable" by 1% of patients treated with NaP tablets and 23.6% treated with PEG solution. Drinking the required volume of clear liquid for the tablet or PEG preparation was rated "easy" or "slightly difficult" by 92.2% and 66.9% of patients, respectively. Almost all (90.7%) patients taking the tablets indicated they would take the same preparation in the future, compared with 67.1% of patients taking the PEG solution (P < 0.0001 for each comparison). Conclusions: Tolerability and patient acceptance of a NaP tablet purgative were superior to 4-L PEG solution.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
AFRIDI, SA ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) :485-489
[2]
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[3]
PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, ENDOSCOPIC-BLINDED TRIAL COMPARING PRECOLONOSCOPY BOWEL CLEANSING METHODS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
WEXNER, SD ;
BINDEROW, SR ;
NOGUERAS, JJ ;
DANIEL, N ;
EHRENPREIS, ED ;
JENSEN, J ;
BONNER, GF ;
RUDERMAN, WB .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (07) :689-696
[4]
Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Wolff, BG ;
Meagher, A ;
Cleveland, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (10) :2187-2191
[5]
LOW SODIUM SOLUTION FOR COLONIC CLEANSING - A DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
FRIED, M ;
SCHNEGG, JF ;
GONVERS, JJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1992, 38 (05) :579-581
[6]
Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Frommer, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (01) :100-104
[7]
A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Wiersema, MJ ;
Melton, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (12) :3186-3194
[8]
Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings [J].
Imperiale, TF ;
Wagner, DR ;
Lin, CY ;
Larkin, GN ;
Rogge, JD ;
Ransohoff, DF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (03) :169-174
[9]
Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials [J].
Kastenberg, D ;
Chasen, R ;
Choudhary, C ;
Riff, D ;
Steinberg, S ;
Weiss, E ;
Wruble, L .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (06) :705-713
[10]
Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phosphate tablets (INKP-101), and a reduced sodium phosphate dose, in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial [J].
Khashab, M ;
Rex, DK .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (04) :465-468