Assessing individual differences in adolescents' preference for rational and experiential cognition

This study assessed the factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of a new instrument, the rational-experiential inventory for adolescents (REI-A), a 20-item measure designed to assess individual differences in preference for rational and experiential cognition in adolescent populations. Data from 306 Australian high school students confirmed the two-factor structure of the existing adult REI (Pacini & Epstein, 1999). Both rational and experiential scales of the REI-A exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80) and excellent five-week test-retest reliability (r > 0.90). Consistent with the tenets of cognitive experiential self theory (Epstein, 1994), higher rational scores were significantly associated with openness to experience, conscientiousness, open-minded thinking, superior reasoning, the absence of neuroticism and the lack of superstitious beliefs. Higher experiential scores were associated with increased emotional expressivity. superstitious beliefs and poorer reasoning. The REI-A provides a valuable tool to assess individual differences in adolescents' preference for rational and experiential cognition. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.