Application of refocused steady-state free-precession methods at 1.5 and 3 T to in vivo high-resolution MRI of trabecular bone: Simulations and experiments

被引:40
作者
Banerjee, S
Han, ET
Krug, R
Newitt, DC
Majumdar, S
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Joint Grad Grp Bioengn, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[3] GE Healthcare, ASL W, Menlo Pk, CA USA
关键词
SSFP; SNR; high-resolution; trabecular micro-architecture; susceptibility;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20348
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the potential of fully-balanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) sequences in in vivo high-resolution (HR) MRI of trabecular bone at field strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by simulation and experimental methods. Materials and Methods: Using simulation studies, refocused SSFP acquisition was optimized for our imaging purposes with a focus on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and SNR efficiency. The signal behavior in trabecular bone was estimated using a magnetostatic model of the trabecular bone and marrow. Eight normal volunteers were imaged at the proximal femur, calcaneus, and the distal tibia on a GE Signa scanner at 1.5 and at 3 T with an optimized single-acquisition SSFP sequence (three-dimensional FIESTA) and an optimized multiple-acquisition SSFP sequence (three-dimensional FIESTA-c). Images were also acquired with a fast gradient echo (FGRE) sequence for evaluation of the SNR performance of SSFP methods. Results: Refocused SSFP images outperformed FGRE acquisitions in both SNR and SNR efficiency at both field strengths. At 3 T, susceptibility effects were visible in FIESTA and FGRE images and much reduced in FIESTA-c images. The magnitude of SNR boost at 3 T was closely predicted by simulations. Conclusion: Single-acquisition SSFP (at 1.5 T) and multiple-acquisition SSFP (at 3 T) hold great potential for HR-MRI of trabecular bone. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Analysis of multiple-acquisition SSFP [J].
Bangerter, NK ;
Hargreaves, BA ;
Vasanawala, SS ;
Pauly, JM ;
Gold, GE ;
Nishimura, DG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (05) :1038-1047
[2]  
CASSELMAN JW, 1993, AM J NEURORADIOL, V14, P47
[3]   MAGNETIC-FIELD DISTRIBUTION IN MODELS OF TRABECULAR BONE [J].
FORD, JC ;
WEHRLI, FW ;
CHUNG, HW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (03) :373-379
[4]  
HAN E, 2003, P 11 ANN M ISMRM TOR
[5]   Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging [J].
Hargreaves, BA ;
Gold, GE ;
Beaulieu, CF ;
Vasanawala, SS ;
Nishimura, DG ;
Pauly, JM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (04) :700-709
[6]   Characterization and reduction of the transient response in steady-state MR imaging [J].
Hargreaves, BA ;
Vasanawala, SS ;
Pauly, JM ;
Nishimura, DG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (01) :149-158
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF SIGNAL INTENSITIES IN THE PRESENCE OF NOISE IN MR IMAGES [J].
HENKELMAN, RM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) :232-233
[8]   In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: Differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients [J].
Link, TM ;
Majumdar, S ;
Augat, P ;
Lin, JC ;
Newitt, D ;
Lu, Y ;
Lane, NE ;
Genant, HK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (07) :1175-1182
[9]   Trabecular bone structure of the distal radius, the calcaneus, and the spine -: Which site predicts fracture status of the spine best? [J].
Link, TM ;
Bauer, J ;
Kollstedt, A ;
Stumpf, I ;
Hudelmaier, M ;
Settles, M ;
Majumdar, S ;
Lochmüller, EM ;
Eckstein, F .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2004, 39 (08) :487-497
[10]   High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: Which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? [J].
Link, TM ;
Vieth, V ;
Stehling, C ;
Lotter, A ;
Beer, A ;
Newitt, D ;
Majumdar, S .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :663-671