Use of a Wearable Automated Defibrillator in Children Compared to Young Adults

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical database for the wearable external defibrillator from ZOLL Lifecor Corporation (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). We compared the use of the wearable defibrillator in patients < 18 years of age to those aged 19-21 years. Results: There were 81 patients < 18 years of age (median age = 16.5 years [9-18] and 52% male). There were 103 patients aged 19-21 years (median age = 20 years [19-21] and 47% male). There was no difference between groups in average hours/day or in total number of days the patients wore the defibrillator. In patients < 18 years of age, there was one inappropriate therapy and one withholding of therapy due to a device-device interaction. In patients aged 19-21 years, there were five appropriate discharges in two patients and one inappropriate discharge in a single patient. Conclusion: It is reasonable to consider the wearable automated external defibrillator as a therapy for pediatric patients who are at high risk of sudden cardiac arrest but who have contraindications to or would like to defer placement of a permanent ICD. As there were no appropriate shocks in our patients < 18 years of age, this study cannot address efficacy of the therapy. (PACE 2010; 33:1119-1124).