Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels with Poor Electrode-Neuron Interface: Partial Tripolar, Single-Channel Thresholds and Psychophysical Tuning Curves

被引:106
作者
Bierer, Julie Arenberg [1 ]
Faulkner, Kathleen F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DEAD REGIONS; INTRACOCHLEAR POSITION; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; INSERTION TRAUMA; TEMPORAL BONE; MASKING; STIMULATION; CONFIGURATION; EXCITATION; LISTENERS;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c7daf4
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of a threshold measure, made with a restricted electrode configuration, to identify channels exhibiting relatively poor spatial selectivity. With a restricted electrode configuration, channel-to-channel variability in threshold may reflect variations in the interface between the electrodes and auditory neurons (i.e., nerve survival, electrode placement, and tissue impedance). These variations in the electrode-neuron interface should also be reflected in psychophysical tuning curve (PTC) measurements. Specifically, it is hypothesized that high single-channel thresholds obtained with the spatially focused partial tripolar (pTP) electrode configuration are predictive of wide or tip-shifted PTCs. Design: Data were collected from five cochlear implant listeners implanted with the HiRes90k cochlear implant (Advanced Bionics Corp., Sylmar, CA). Single-channel thresholds and most comfortable listening levels were obtained for stimuli that varied in presumed electrical field size by using the pTP configuration for which a fraction of current (sigma) from a center-active electrode returns through two neighboring electrodes and the remainder through a distant indifferent electrode. Forward-masked PTCs were obtained for channels with the highest, lowest, and median tripolar (sigma = 1 or 0.9) thresholds. The probe channel and level were fixed and presented with either the monopolar (sigma = 0) or a more focused pTP (sigma >= 0.55) configuration. The masker channel and level were varied, whereas the configuration was fixed to sigma = 0.5. A standard, three-interval, two-alternative forced choice procedure was used for thresholds and masked levels. Results: Single-channel threshold and variability in threshold across channels systematically increased as the compensating current, sigma, increased and the presumed electrical field became more focused. Across subjects, channels with the highest single-channel thresholds, when measured with a narrow, pTP stimulus, had significantly broader PTCs than the lowest threshold channels. In two subjects, the tips of the tuning curves were shifted away from the probe channel. Tuning curves were also wider for the monopolar probes than with pTP probes for both the highest and lowest threshold channels. Conclusions: These results suggest that single-channel thresholds measured with a restricted stimulus can be used to identify cochlear implant channels with poor spatial selectivity. Channels having wide or tip-shifted tuning characteristics would likely not deliver the appropriate spectral information to the intended auditory neurons, leading to suboptimal perception. As a clinical tool, quick identification of impaired channels could lead to patient-specific mapping strategies and result in improved speech and music perception.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 258
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations [J].
Berenstein, Carlo K. ;
Mens, Lucas H. M. ;
Mulder, Jef J. S. ;
Vanpoucke, Filiep J. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (02) :250-260
[2]   Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Dependence on electrode configuration [J].
Bierer, JA ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :478-492
[3]   Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: Evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration [J].
Bierer, Julie Arenberg .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (03) :1642-1653
[4]   Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems [J].
Boëx, C ;
Kós, MI ;
Pelizzone, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 114 (04) :2058-2065
[5]   Current focusing and steering: Modeling, physiology, and psychophysics [J].
Bonham, Ben H. ;
Litvak, Leonid M. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 242 (1-2) :141-153
[6]   Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients [J].
Chatterjee, M ;
Galvin, JJ ;
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 7 (01) :15-25
[7]   Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking [J].
Cohen, LT ;
Richardson, LM ;
Saunders, E ;
Cowan, RSC .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 179 (1-2) :72-87
[8]   Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects [J].
de Balthasar, C ;
Boëx, C ;
Cosendai, G ;
Valentini, G ;
Sigrist, A ;
Pelizzone, M .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 182 (1-2) :77-87
[9]   Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes [J].
Finley, Charles C. ;
Holden, Timothy A. ;
Holden, Laura K. ;
Whiting, Bruce R. ;
Chole, Richard A. ;
Neely, Gail J. ;
Hullar, Timothy E. ;
Skinner, Margaret W. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (07) :920-928
[10]   Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting [J].
Gani, Mathieu ;
Valentini, Gregory ;
Sigrist, Alain ;
Kos, Maria-Izabel ;
Boex, Colette .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 8 (01) :69-83