Nodule detection in digital chest radiography:: Effect of anatomical noise

被引:39
作者
Båth, M [1 ]
Håkansson, M
Börjesson, S
Hoeschen, C
Tischenko, O
Kheddache, S
Vikgren, J
Månsson, LG
机构
[1] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Otto Von Guericke Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nch526
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
The image background resulting from imaged anatomy can be divided into those components that are meaningful to the observers, in the sense that they are recognised as separate structures, and those that are not. These latter components (referred to as anatomical noise) can be removed using a method developed within the RADIUS group. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the removal of the anatomical noise results in images where lung nodules with lower contrast can be detected. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was therefore conducted using two types of images: clinical chest images and chest images in which the anatomical noise had been removed. Simulated designer nodules with a full-width-at-fifth-maximum of 10 mm but with varying contrast were added to the images. The contrast needed to obtain an area under the ROC curve of 0.80, C-0.8, was used as a measure of detectability (a low value of C0.8 represents a high detectability). Five regions of the chest X ray were investigated and it was found that in all regions the removal of anatomical noise led to images with lower C-0.8 than the original images. On average, C-0.8 was 20% higher in the original images, ranging from 7% (the lateral pulmonary regions) to 41% (the upper mediastinal regions).
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 113
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography:: Part of image background acting as pure noise [J].
Båth, M ;
Håkansson, M ;
Börjesson, S ;
Kheddache, S ;
Grahn, A ;
Bochud, FO ;
Verdun, FR ;
Månsson, LG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :102-108
[2]
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography:: Introduction to the radius chest trial [J].
Båth, M ;
Håkansson, M ;
Börjesson, S ;
Kheddache, S ;
Grahn, A ;
Ruschin, M ;
Tingberg, A ;
Mattsson, S ;
Månsson, LG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :85-91
[3]
A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology [J].
Börjesson, S ;
Håkansson, M ;
Båth, M ;
Kheddache, S ;
Svensson, S ;
Tingberg, A ;
Grahn, A ;
Ruschin, M ;
Hemdal, B ;
Mattsson, S ;
Månsson, LG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :45-52
[4]
Nodule detection in two component noise: Toward patient structure [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Li, X ;
Abbey, CK .
IMAGE PERCEPTION: MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3036 :2-13
[5]
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography:: Summary of the radius chest trial [J].
Håkansson, M ;
Båth, M ;
Börjesson, S ;
Kheddache, S ;
Grahn, A ;
Ruschin, M ;
Tingberg, A ;
Mattsson, S ;
Månsson, LG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :114-120
[6]
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography:: Effect of system noise [J].
Håkansson, M ;
Båth, M ;
Börjesson, S ;
Kheddache, S ;
Johnsson, ÅA ;
Månsson, LG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :97-101
[7]
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography:: Effect of nodule location [J].
Håkansson, M ;
Båth, M ;
Börjesson, S ;
Kheddache, S ;
Flinck, A ;
Ullman, G ;
Månsson, LG .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :92-96
[8]
Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images [J].
Hoeschen, C ;
Tischenko, O ;
Buhr, E ;
Illers, H .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :75-80
[9]
Reduction of anatomical noise in medical X-ray images [J].
Tischenko, O ;
Hoeschen, C ;
Buhr, E .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :69-74
[10]
Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms [J].
Tischenko, O ;
Hoeschen, C ;
Dance, DR ;
Hunt, RA ;
Maidment, ADA ;
Bakic, PR .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :81-84